Sign In
Events
Newsletters
Search

Close

Close Search

Cancel

SEARCH
MY LAW.COMNEW

Martin v. Woodyard

The petitioner failed to prove that the appellant committed the offense of stalking.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Marlena Martin appeals following the imposition of a stalking protective order, arguing that the trial court abused its discretion by entering the order because the evidence was insufficient to establish the elements of the offense of stalking. We agree and reverse. The record shows that the appellee, Walter C. Woodyard II,1 filed a petition for a temporary protective order based on allegations of stalking, specifically that Martin sent him an harassing email and that she created a web site with Steve Brewer, a former business associate of Woodyard, to destroy him. Woodyard also sought a protective order against Brewer and a joint hearing was held on these petitions, following which the trial court dismissed the petition against Brewer but issued a stalking 12-month protective order against Martin.

Testimony presented at the hearing and other evidence of record shows that the difficulties between Martin and Woodyard stemmed from a dispute over property Martin leased from Woodyard, and this dispute had resulted in litigation. At the hearing, Woodyard read several profanity laden emails he alleged Martin sent him, and he also testified that she had created a website and had been emailing others “slanderous stuff” but offered no proof of these other alleged acts other than his own testimony. Further, despite the profane and scurrilous nature of the emails, Woodyard testified that he would not have filed the petition seeking the protective order against Martin but for her association with Brewer, about whom he expressed fear. Specifically he testified that “all the time she was bothering me, I wasn’t worried about it. When Brewer got involved with her, now it’s a concern.”

Trending Stories

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

LEARN MORE

More From ALM

Premium Subscription
With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Team Accounts
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Bundle Subscriptions
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
Go to CLE Center
Southeastern Legal Awards 2025
May 01, 2025
Atlanta, GA

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
ThinkAdvisor LUMINARIES Awards 2024
December 11, 2024
Las Vegas, NV

This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.


Learn More
Complex Claims & Litigation Forum 2025
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More
Go to Events Go to Webcasts
Associate Litigator

Borteck & Czapek, P.C., based in Florham Park, is a boutique estates and trusts law firm specializing in estate planning and administrat...


Apply Now ›
Gwinnett County: State Court Staff Attorney

Gwinnett County State Court is seeking an attorney to assist the Judge by conducting a variety of legal research, analysis, and document pre...


Apply Now ›
Corporate Counsel

CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS:(1) Tasks and responsibilities include:Reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements for internal business...


Apply Now ›
Go to Lawjobs