Marc C. Roberts was tried by a Gwinnett County jury and convicted of rape,1 incest,2 and aggravated sexual battery.3 On appeal, he claims that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his rape conviction and that the court below erred when it admitted a recording of his interrogation because, he says, the recording includes comments by a police officer that pertained to the ultimate issue and improperly bolstered the credibility of the victim. We find no merit in these claims of error and affirm the judgment of conviction. 1. We first consider whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the rape conviction. To this end, we ask whether any rational jury could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of guilt in the evidence adduced at trial, viewing that evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict. Howard v. State , 310 Ga. App. 659, 659 1 714 SE2d 255 2011. And as we consider this question, we must keep in mind that it is the function of the jury, not appellate judges, to assess the credibility of witnesses, weigh and draw reasonable inferences from the evidence, and resolve conflicts in the evidence. See Ferguson v. State , 307 Ga. App. 232, 233 1 704 SE2d 470 2010. So, if the record contains some competent evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt each element of the crimes of which the defendant was convicted, we must uphold the conviction, even if the evidence is controverted. Id.
To prove that Roberts raped the victim, the State was required to show that he had carnal knowledge of the victim forcibly and against her will. OCGA § 16-6-1 a 1. Roberts does not dispute that the evidence shows that he had carnal knowledge of the victim, but he says that there is no evidence that he did so forcibly and against her will. We disagree. The victim testified at trial, and she said that Roberts entered her bedroom, held down her hands as she tried to push him away, and had sexual intercourse with her as she screamed, telling him “no” and to “stop.” Without anything more, this testimony is enough to permit a rational trier of fact to find beyond a reasonable doubt that Roberts committed rape. See Duran v. State , 274 Ga. App. 876, 878 1 619 SE2d 388 2005 testimony of victim about forcible intercourse was sufficient to sustain conviction for rape.