In 1995, John Rooney entered a negotiated plea of guilty to rape, aggravated sodomy, aggravated sexual battery, and three counts of battery. In an unpublished opinion, this Court affirmed the denial of his motion for an out-of-time appeal. Rooney v. State , 248 Ga. App. XXVII 2001. In the years since, Rooney has filed several motions for post-conviction relief. See Rooney v. State , 287 Ga. 1 690 SE2d 804 2010. Most recently, Rooney filed a Motion to Vacate Unconstitutional, Null, and Void Sentences, a Motion to Secure Attendance of a State Prisoner at Hearings, and a Motion to Disqualify and/or Recuse Trial Judge. The trial court denied the motions, and Rooney appeals. For the reasons explained below, we affirm. 1. The trial court sentenced Rooney to 64 years confinement and ordered that, upon service of 50 years, Rooney could serve the remaining 14 years on probation . As special conditions of such probation , the trial court ordered that Rooney have no contact with the victim and that he submit to mental health counseling. Rooney contends that the trial court unconstitutionally invaded the authority of the Board of Pardons and Paroles when it imposed future conditions on parole . Regardless of any reference to parole made during the sentencing hearing, however, the judgment entered on July 10, 1995, makes no reference to any future parole. Howard v. State , 281 Ga. App. 797, 803 4 637 SE2d 448 2006 “A written sentence controls over the trial court’s oral pronouncements.” citation, punctuation, and footnote omitted. Further, the trial court acted within its authority in imposing conditions on probation.1 OCGA § 42-8-35 a “The trial court shall determine the terms and conditions of probation.”; State v. Pless , 282 Ga. 58, 61 646 SE2d 202 2007 “OCGA § 42-8-35 vests the sentencing court with the general power to impose reasonable conditions of probation.”; see also Terry v. Hamrick , 284 Ga. 24, 27 3 663 SE2d 256 2008 “A trial court has broad discretion in fashioning probation conditions.” citation omitted. Accordingly, this argument lacks merit.
2. Rooney contends that the trial court imposed special conditions of probation without his knowledge or consent. “The only ground for authorizing a trial court to correct a sentence at any time is that the sentence is void. A sentence is void if the court imposes punishment that the law does not allow.” Citations and punctuation omitted. Rooney v. State , 287 Ga. at 2 2.2 Even if the trial court failed to notify Rooney on the record of every detail of the conditions of probation, however, Rooney failed to articulate any basis for finding that his sentence in any way imposes punishment that the law does not allow. Consequently, this argument provides no basis for vacating his sentence. Coleman v. State , 305 Ga. App. 680, 680-681 700 SE2d 668 2010.
