X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Ernest Grady, appearing pro se, appeals the trial court’s order denying his “Motion for Modification and Reduction of Sentence” pursuant to OCGA § 17-10-1 f. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. The record shows that on February 23, 2010, Grady entered a guilty plea to charges of conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance OCGA § 16-13-33, trafficking in cocaine OCGA § 16-13-31 a 1, three counts of sale of controlled substance OCGA § 16-13-30 b, and two counts of use of a communication facility in the commission of a felony OCGA § 16-13-32.3 a. On March 26, 2010, he was sentenced as a recidivist under OCGA § 17-10-7 c to an aggregate term of 30 years, to serve 20 years of incarceration and the balance on probation, along with a fine in the amount of $300,000 and surcharges. On September 28, 2010, approximately six months after the entry of his sentence, Grady filed a pro se “Motion for Modification and Reduction of Sentence.” Grady’s motion was purportedly filed pursuant to OCGA § 17-10-1 f, which provides as follows: Within one year of the date upon which the sentence is imposed, or within 120 days after receipt by the sentencing court of the remittitur upon affirmance of the judgment after direct appeal, whichever is later, the court imposing the sentence has the jurisdiction, power, and authority to correct or reduce the sentence and to suspend or probate all or any part of the sentence imposed. Prior to entering any order correcting, reducing, or modifying any sentence, the court shall afford notice and an opportunity for a hearing to the prosecuting attorney. Any order modifying a sentence which is entered without notice and an opportunity for a hearing as provided in this subsection shall be void. This subsection shall not limit any other jurisdiction granted to the court in this Code section or as provided for in subsection g of Code Section 42-8-34. Since Grady’s motion was filed within one year of when his sentence was imposed, it was timely filed based upon the time limitation set forth in the statute.

Significantly, however, Grady’s enumerations of error in this appeal reveal that he does not seek to challenge his sentence,1 but rather, the conviction on which the sentence is based. In this regard, Grady contends that his motion was erroneously denied since the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction, the State failed to set forth a factual basis for the plea, and his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to make a reasonable investigation in the case. Notwithstanding his contentions, “the authority granted to trial courts by OCGA § 17-10-1 f to modify sentences . . . does not, on its face, include the power to vacate the conviction on which the sentence is based.” Punctuation and footnote omitted. Ellison v. State , 283 Ga. 461 660 SE2d 373 2008.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
October 24, 2024
Georgetown, Washington D.C.

The National Law Journal honors attorneys & judges who've made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in the D.C. area.


Learn More
October 29, 2024
East Brunswick, NJ

New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.


Learn More
November 07, 2024
Orlando, FL

This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.


Learn More

With bold growth in recent years, Fox Rothschild brings together 1,000 attorneys coast to coast. We offer the reach and resources of a natio...


Apply Now ›

About Us:Monjur.com is a leading provider of contracts-as-a-service for managed service providers, offering tailored solutions to streamline...


Apply Now ›

Dynamic Boutique law firm with offices in NYC, Westchester County and Dutchess County, is seeking a mid level litigation associate to work ...


Apply Now ›