Jeffrey Waldon died on January 19, 2008, when his femoral artery was punctured by a knife held by Deiran Green during a physical struggle between the two men.1 The State indicted Green for malice murder, felony murder with aggravated assault as the underlying offense, aggravated assault, and possession of a knife during the commission of a felony. On November 16, 2009, Green filed a motion to dismiss the indictment, arguing that he was immune from criminal prosecution pursuant to OCGA § 16-3-24.2.2 The trial court granted Green’s motion on November 19, 2009, finding that: 1 Waldon had assaulted Green by head-butting him in the mouth; 2 at the time of the confrontation, Green was in fear of death, or in fear of having a forcible felony committed against him by Waldon; and 3 Waldon had placed Green in reasonable fear for his life, which indicated that Green had acted in his own self-defense pursuant to OCGA § 16-3-21.3 The State appeals.4 As explained more fully below, because evidence supported the trial court’s finding, we affirm. 1. The State argues that the trial court erred in concluding that Green was immune from prosecution because the use of force is a necessary prerequisite under OCGA § 16-3-21 to a finding of justification and there was no evidence that Green used force against Waldon. We disagree.
Contrary to the State’s contention, OCGA § 16-3-21 does not require that a person use actual force to support a claim for justification. Pursuant to OCGA § 16-3-21 a, “a person is justified in threatening or using force against another when and to the extent that he reasonably believes that such threat or force is necessary to defend himself against such other’s imminent use of unlawful force” emphasis supplied. See also OCGA § 16-3-24.2 “A person who uses threats or force in accordance with Code Section 16-3-21 . . . shall be immune from criminal prosecution.” emphasis supplied. Thus, a mere threat of force is all that is required when one reasonably believes that he must defend himself against another’s imminent use of unlawful force. In this regard, a person is justified in going beyond merely threatening to use force and actually “using force which is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm . . . if he . . . reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent death or great bodily injury to himself.” OCGA § 16-3-21 a.
