Ossia Phillip appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion to correct a void sentence on the basis that the motion was untimely. Because the record shows that Phillip’s sentence was, indeed, void, we reverse the court’s order, vacate the sentence, and remand this case for resentencing. The record shows that, in September 2009, Phillip entered a non-negotiated guilty plea to fourteen counts of dogfighting, OCGA § 16-12-37 b, and two counts of aggravated cruelty to animals, OCGA § 16-12-4 c. The trial court sentenced Phillip to seventeen years imprisonment, with ten to serve; the final judgment includes the phrase “each ct. sic concurrent.” In July 2010, Phillip filed a motion to correct a void sentence, asserting that his sentence is void because it exceeds the maximum of five years imprisonment for each count.1 He argued that, because the judgment indicates that each sentence is to run concurrently with the others, his 17-year sentence exceeds the maximum statutory punishment for the offenses and is, therefore, illegal and void. The trial court denied the motion on the basis that it was filed outside the term of court in which the sentencing occurred and, as a consequence, the court lacked jurisdiction to vacate the sentence. Phillip appeals, contending that his sentence is void and, therefore, the court erred in concluding that it lacked jurisdiction over his motion to vacate the sentence. We agree.
Generally, “a trial court has no jurisdiction to modify a sentence after the term of court ends or 60 days pass. Where a sentence is void, however, the court may resentence the defendant at any time. A sentence is void if the court imposes punishment that the law does not allow.” Citations omitted. Crumbley v. State , 261 Ga. 610, 611 1 409 SE2d 517 1991. Moreover, “a defendant’s acquiescence to an illegal sentence, either through plea negotiations or a failure to object to the sentence, cannot render an otherwise illegal sentence valid through waiver. That is because a void sentence in law amounts to no sentence at all.” Citation and punctuation omitted. Zipperer v. State , 299 Ga. App. 792, 794 2 683 SE2d 865 2009. Thus, “a void sentence may be so held in any court where it becomes material to the interest of the parties to consider it, regardless of a lack of objection in the trial court.” Citation and punctuation omitted. Id.
