X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Jaimie Carboy filed a petition for a temporary family violence protective order against George Birchby pursuant to the Family Violence Act.1 The trial court granted the petition and entered a 12-month family violence protective order. Following the denial of his motion for new trial, Birchby filed an application for discretionary appeal, which this Court granted.2 On appeal, Birchby argues that the trial court erred by 1 entering a final judgment that did not conform to its verbal ruling; 2 failing to make specific written findings of fact and conclusions of law in the final order; 3 authorizing Carboy’s attorney to decide the child support amount set forth in the order; 4 concluding that it had no authority to withhold the transmission of the final order to the Georgia Protective Order Registry3; 5 failing to consider the parties’ pending divorce action; 6 denying Birchby’s request to reopen the evidence; and 7 denying Birchby’s motion for new trial. We affirm, for reasons that follow. Carboy filed a petition for a family violence temporary protective order pursuant to OCGA § 19-13-1 et seq., alleging that Birchby, her husband, kicked her in the ribs, pushed her, and intimidated her with his gun. Carboy sought temporary custody of their child, exclusive use and possession of the family residence, and child support, as well as a protective order enjoining Birchby from having contact with her or their child.

At the conclusion of a three-day hearing,4 the trial court gave a lengthy verbal ruling, stating therein that it had “serious concerns about the credibility of both parties based upon the evidence,” and noted that Carboy “may have been the instigator.” Nevertheless, the trial court concluded that “this is a family violence petition, and Carboy has proven . . . by a preponderance of the evidence that an incident occurred that constitutes family violence under the law. . . . The action of kicking Carboy in the chest constituted an act of family violence.” After describing the terms of the order, the trial court directed counsel for Carboy to prepare the order, noting that it would consider any objections or response thereto from counsel for Birchby. The subsequent “Family Violence Twelve Month Protective Order” ordered that Birchby “shall not contact, communicate, or come about Carboy’s residence or place of employment, or come within 500 yards of her except as may be necessary with regard to visitation or discussions regarding their child”; awarded Carboy exclusive use of the residence; awarded temporary child support; and prohibited Birchby from possessing a firearm. Birchby subsequently filed motions to reopen the evidence, for reconsideration, and for a new trial. Following a hearing, the trial court denied Birchby’s motions, and this appeal followed.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
May 01, 2025
Atlanta, GA

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
December 11, 2024
Las Vegas, NV

This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More

McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a litigation associate for its office located in Hartford, CT. One to three years of experie...


Apply Now ›

Borteck & Czapek, P.C., based in Florham Park, is a boutique estates and trusts law firm specializing in estate planning and administrat...


Apply Now ›

Gwinnett County State Court is seeking an attorney to assist the Judge by conducting a variety of legal research, analysis, and document pre...


Apply Now ›