X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

This appeal stems from a grant of certiorari regarding the Court of Appeals’ decision in Dziwura v. Broda , 297 Ga. App. 1 676 SE2d 400 2009. Appellant Mindy Broda and her husband John Broda sued appellee Joan Dziwura, as well as appellee’s purported employer Winmark Homes, for negligence associated with injuries appellant sustained in a car accident caused by appellee.1 At trial, appellant presented evidence that Winmark Homes was also liable for the accident as appellee’s employer, whereas Winmark Homes presented evidence that appellee was instead an independent contractor of the real estate brokerage firm which marketed and sold its homes. Prior to the jury rendering its verdict, appellant entered into a high-low agreement2 with Winmark Homes which provided that if the jury returned a defense verdict for Winmark Homes or a verdict in favor of appellant for less than $350,000, then Winmark Homes would be required to pay appellant $250,000. If the jury returned a verdict against Winmark Homes greater than $3.1 million, then appellant could only collect $3 million from Winmark Homes and would have to forgo collection of the additional amounts. If the verdict was against Winmark Homes and was between $350,000 and $3.1 million, then the exact verdict amount would be paid by Winmark Homes without appeal by either party. The jury returned a verdict against appellee for just over $1 million for appellant’s tort claim and a verdict against Mr. Broda for his loss of consortium claim. The jury did not find that Winmark Homes had any liability for appellant’s claim.3 Based on this outcome and the express terms of the high-low agreement, Winmark Homes was obligated to pay appellant $250,000. Prior to the entry of judgment, appellee moved the trial court to set-off the $250,000 settlement amount from the one million dollar verdict amount awarded against appellee. The trial court denied the motion because the jury did not find Winmark Homes to be a joint tortfeasor. Appellee appealed to the Court of Appeals which agreed with the trial court’s finding that Winmark Homes was not a joint tortfeasor, but reversed the trial court’s denial of the motion for set-off because it determined that appellant was not entitled to a recovery greater than the amount awarded by the jury. In support of its decision to reverse, the Court of Appeals adopted the Restatement Second of Torts § 885 34 and Comment f.5 We granted certiorari to consider whether the Court of Appeals correctly held that a set-off was proper in this case. Because we answer in the negative, the Court of Appeals’ decision is reversed.

In actions concerning a tort, a benefit bestowed on the injured party should not be shifted so as to create a windfall for the tortfeasor. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1324 v. Roberts , 263 Ga. 405 1 434 SE2d 450 1993. If a windfall must be had, it will inure to the benefit of the injured party rather than relieve the wrongdoer of full responsibility for his wrongdoing. Id. at 407 citing to Denton v. Conway Southern Express , 261Ga. 41, 46 n. 5 402 SE2d 269 1991. In keeping with this purpose of full responsibility, a tortfeasor cannot diminish his liability based on payments made by a non-tortfeasor. See Adkins v. Knight , 256 Ga. App. 394 568 SE2d 517 2002 award against defendant could not be set-off against plaintiff’s settlement with her uninsured motorist carrier because the carrier was not a tortfeasor; Thompson v. Milam , 115 Ga. App. 396, 397 154 SE2d 721 1967 “A tortfeasor cannot diminish the amount of his liability by pleading payments made to the plaintiff under the terms of a contract between the plaintiff and a third party who is not a joint tortfeasor.” “Basic fairness and justice dictate that a tortfeasor should not benefit from a plaintiff’s good fortune in reaching settlements with other potential defendants not determined to be liable.” Fidelholtz v. Peller , 81 Ohio St3d 197, 202 690 NE2d 502 1998.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
May 01, 2025
Atlanta, GA

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
December 11, 2024
Las Vegas, NV

This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More

COLE SCHOTZ P.C.LITIGATION PARALEGAL - FLORIDA OFFICE: Prominent mid-Atlantic law firm with multiple regional office locations seeks a L...


Apply Now ›

McCarter and English s Chambers-ranked Government Contracts group is seeking an experienced, diligent, and proactive government contracts as...


Apply Now ›

McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a litigation associate for its office located in Hartford, CT. One to three years of experie...


Apply Now ›