Appellant Sean Stewart appeals his conviction for the felony murders of Sam Walthour and Edward Morgan.1 In early May 1998, appellant sold drugs to Sam Walthour for $50,000 in cash. Believing Walthour had more cash in his possession, appellant enlisted three other accomplices to help him rob Walthour. On May 12, 1998, appellant and his accomplices drove from Atlanta to Walthour’s house in Liberty County. Two of the three accomplices went inside the house to rob Walthour while appellant and the third accomplice, Chris Hanna, remained in the van. Meanwhile, Edward Morgan, Walthour’s friend, came by Walthour’s house. Upon approaching the house, Morgan was dragged inside the house. One of the accomplices inside the house fatally shot Morgan and Walthour each in his head. The accomplices ran out of the house, entered the van, and all four men fled the scene. A witness testified that appellant threw the murder weapon into a river on the way back to Atlanta. Appellant admitted to police and testified under oath that it was his idea to rob Walthour and that he enlisted the others, setting the events of May 12, 1998, into motion. 1. The evidence adduced at trial and summarized above was sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of felony murder. Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307 99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560 1979.
2. During the trial, one of Walthour’s neighbors testified that he heard yelling on the night of the shootings. The prosecutor asked if the witness believed the yelling to be “terrorizing,” and appellant objected on the basis of speculation. Once the trial court overruled the objection, the witness responded to the question in the negative. On appeal, appellant complains that the question was irrelevant to appellant’s guilt or innocence and that the word “terrorizing” served to inflame the jury. Inasmuch as appellant failed to object on the grounds he now asserts on appeal, this purported error is not preserved for review. Arrington v. State , 286 Ga. 335 13 a 687 SE2d 438 2009; Helton v. State , 268 Ga. App. 430 2 602 SE2d 198 2004 “An objection different from that made below may not be claimed on appeal; appeal is limited to the ground advanced below.”
