A jury found Tara Williams guilty of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and drug trafficking within 1,000 feet of public housing. Williams filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court denied. On appeal, Williams challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain her convictions. She further contends that the trial court erred 1 in denying her motion to suppress the drug evidence; 2 in denying her the right to impeach an officer with evidence of his alleged racial bias in prior unrelated cases; 3 in denying a new trial based upon the state’s alleged failure to produce exculpatory fingerprint evidence during discovery; 4 in denying her motion for a mistrial based upon the state’s violation of the trial court’s ruling excluding the contents of a letter used to refresh a witness’s recollection; 5 in denying a new trial based upon the prosecutor’s misstatement of the evidence during closing argument; 6 and in improperly commenting upon the evidence at trial. Because the evidence was insufficient to establish that Williams’s residence was located in a publicly owned or operated housing project, we must reverse the drug trafficking conviction. As to the possession of marijuana with intent to distribute conviction and the remaining claims of error, however, we affirm. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed in part and reversed in part. “On appeal the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to support the verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence; moreover, an appellate court determines evidence sufficiency and does not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility.” Citation omitted. Clyde v. State , 298 Ga. App. 283 680 SE2d 146 2009. See also Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U. S. 307 99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560 1979.
So viewed, the evidence presented at trial established that on December 6, 2005, officers with the Dublin Police Department obtained and executed a search warrant for Williams’s residence. When the officers arrived at the residence, Williams was wearing a tan jacket and sitting outside on the porch. When the officers approached, Williams fled, crawling “very rapidly” inside the residence. The officers pursued Williams through the front door. After the officers entered the residence, Williams came out of the closet area located directly behind the front door. The officers performed a pat down search of Williams for weapons, conducted a safety search to ensure that no other adults were present, and then searched the residence.
