Hughes v. State

The defendant fled from a vehicle, leaving behind two ounces of marijuana in two separate bags, a set of electronic scales and baggies.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

A jury found William Hughes guilty of possession of methamphetamine with intent to sell, possession of marijuana with intent to sell, fleeing to elude a police officer, driving with a suspended license, and obstruction of a law enforcement officer. Hughes appeals, alleging the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict as to the possession of marijuana with intent to sell charge. We find no error and affirm Hughes’ convictions. A motion for a directed verdict should be granted only when there is no conflict in the evidence and the evidence demands a verdict of acquittal as a matter of law.1 The standard of review for the denial of a motion for directed verdict of acquittal is the same as for determining the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction: the evidence must be sufficient for a rational trier of fact to find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty of the charged offense.2 The evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to support the verdict and the defendant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence; moreover, an appellate court determines evidence sufficiency and does not weigh the evidence or determine the credibility of witnesses.3

Viewed in that light, the evidence at trial showed that Hughes fled from a vehicle, leaving behind two ounces of marijuana in two separate bags, a set of electronic scales, and baggies. In addition, a detective with over one thousand hours of training in narcotics investigation, drug identification, including marijuana, and undercover operations, testified that based on his training and experience in over several hundred marijuana cases, any amount over an ounce of marijuana, coupled with packaging and weighing devices, would indicate possession with intent to distribute.

Hughes v. State

The defendant fled from a vehicle, leaving behind two ounces of marijuana in two separate bags, a set of electronic scales and baggies.

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to Daily Report