X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Tara Foods and Sedgwick CMS hereinafter collectively “Tara Foods” appeal after we granted their application for discretionary review. The application sought review of the superior court’s order reversing a decision by the Appellate Division of the State Board of Workers’ Compensation. Tara Foods contends the superior court committed legal error in finding that Beverly Johnson made an application for catastrophic designation of her compensable injury within the statutory time frame set out in OCGA § 34-9-104 b. Both the administrative law judge and the Appellate Division found that Johnson’s claim for catastrophic designation was barred by the statute of limitations, which requires an “application” to be filed within two years of the last payment of income benefits. OCGA § 34-9-104 b. The superior court reversed, finding Johnson made a proper application for catastrophic designation under the statute. Because we find that the ALJ and the Appellate Division correctly interpreted the applicable statute of limitation, we reverse. Our review in this case is governed by the principle that “erroneous applications of law to undisputed facts, as well as decisions based on erroneous theories of law, are subject to the de novo standard of review.” Citations and punctuation omitted. Trent Tube v. Hurston , 261 Ga. App. 525 583 SE2d 198 2003. See also Rite-Aid Corp. v. Davis , 280 Ga. App. 522, 523 1 634 SE2d 480 2006.

The facts in this case are undisputed. On November 30, 1992, Johnson sustained a work injury to her neck, which Tara Foods accepted as compensable. Johnson received income benefits arising from this injury. The last benefit was paid August 28, 2001. In November 2002, Johnson filed a WC-14 form. The form included three options: “notice of claim,” “request for hearing,” and “request for mediation.” Johnson marked the box beside “notice of claim.” She also indicated by checking the appropriate line that she was not requesting a hearing. In addition, she checked a line reading, “Add additional issues see reverse.” On the reverse of the form, Johnson checked the box next to “income benefits” and wrote “TTD1 from 8-28-01 for catastrophic designation.” But because Johnson did not request a hearing, no hearing was scheduled and no action was taken with regard to this form.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
May 01, 2025
Atlanta, GA

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More
March 24, 2025
New York, NY

Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.


Learn More

Our client, a boutique plaintiffs firm is seeking to hire a junior to mid-level litigation associate to join its growing team. Hired associ...


Apply Now ›

SALARY: $8,000.69 Biweekly$17,334.83 Monthly$208,017.95 AnnuallyOPENING DATE: 01/29/2025CLOSING DATE: 02/27/2025 11:59 PM PacificDEFINITION/...


Apply Now ›

Our client is seeking to hire a supervisory attorney for their growing Alabama team. Qualified candidates will have 8+ years of litigation...


Apply Now ›