X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Vicki Hentz sued the City of Chickamauga for personal injuries, pain and suffering, lost wages, and medical expenses after she fell while walking on a City-owned “recreational walkway surrounding Gordon Lee Memorial High School . . . used by members of the Chickamauga community for exercising, walking and jogging.” The City moved for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that Hentz’s claims were barred by the Recreational Property Act “RPA”.1 Hentz filed a response to the City’s motion and, five months later, amended her complaint to strike the original paragraphs that described the walkway as being for “recreational purposes” and to insert paragraphs describing the walkway as merely a sidewalk used for pedestrian travel. Subsequently, the trial court denied the City’s motion, but certified the order for immediate review. We granted the City’s application for interlocutory review to determine whether the RPA shields it from liability. Because we find that the RPA applies in this case and that the trial court, therefore, erred in denying the City’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, we reverse. We first address Hentz’ argument that the City waived its right to complain of the judgment by not renewing its motion for judgment on the pleadings after Hentz filed her amended complaint. Although the complaint was amended after the City filed its motion for judgment on the pleadings, the amendment did not materially change Hentz’ cause of action. It is thus immaterial that there was no renewal of the motion after the amendment.2

The purpose of the RPA is to encourage landowners to make their land available for public recreational use by limiting landowners’ liability toward persons entering the land for recreational purposes.3 To that end, the RPA provides that owners of land used for recreational purposes generally owe no duty to the public to keep the premises safe or to warn of dangerous conditions: An owner of land owes no duty of care to keep the premises safe for entry or use by others for recreational purposes or to give any warning of a dangerous condition, use, structure, or activity on the premises to persons entering for recreational purposes.4 Moreover, OCGA § 51-3-23 specifically provides:

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
October 15, 2024
Los Angeles, CA

Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!


Learn More
October 15, 2024
Los Angeles, CA

Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.


Learn More
October 15, 2024
Dallas, TX

The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.


Learn More

Mid sized NYC Personal Injury Defense Firm seeking to immediately hire several attorneys to join our firm. Preferred candidates are those w...


Apply Now ›

Mid-size Parsippany based law firm with a statewide practice is searching for a full-time motivated associate litigation attorney with 3-5 y...


Apply Now ›

Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in Princeton, NJ for an associate in the Litigation Department. The ideal candidate will have tw...


Apply Now ›