This appeal involves the validity and enforceability of an antenuptial agreement.1 The wife challenged the agreement on two grounds: 1 OCGA § 19-3-63 renders the antenuptial agreement void as a “marriage contract . . . made in contemplation of marriage” not attested by at least two witnesses; and 2 the antenuptial agreement is unenforceable due to insufficient financial disclosure before it was executed. The trial court upheld the agreement. We affirm. 1. Enforcement of an antenuptial agreement is a matter of public policy. See Langley v. Langley , 279 Ga. 374, 376 613 SE2d 614 2005. In deciding whether to enforce an antenuptial agreement, the trial court “has discretion to ‘approve the agreement in whole or in part, or refuse to approve it as a whole.’ ” Alexander v. Alexander , 279 Ga. 116, 117-118 610 SE2d 48 2005 quoting Allen v. Allen , 260 Ga. 777, 778 400 SE2d 15 1991. Accordingly, we evaluate a trial court’s ruling regarding the enforceability of an antenuptial agreement under the familiar abuse of discretion standard of review. Blige v. Blige , 283 Ga. 65, 68 656 SE2d 822 2008. Under this standard, we review the trial court’s legal holdings de novo, and we uphold the trial court’s factual findings as long as they are not clearly erroneous, which means there is some evidence in the record to support them. See Langley , 279 Ga. at 377; Alexander Props. Group v. Doe , 280 Ga. 306, 308 626 SE2d 497 2006; Williams v. State , 277 Ga. 598, 601 592 SE2d 848 2004.
2. The evidence in the record, construed to support the trial court’s ruling, showed as follows. G. Lawson Lawrence and Angela M. Lawrence began dating in July 2001. Mr. Lawrence owned the building where Ms. Lawrence worked. Ms. Lawrence was an office worker at the time. After a year and half of dating, the couple moved in together, and they were married two years later. Mr. Lawrence, a two-time divorce, was concerned about the financial impact of a third divorce. Thus, throughout the couple’s four-year-long courtship, whenever the topic of marriage came up, Mr. Lawrence would raise the issue of entering into an antenuptial agreement. On February 27, 2005, a little over a month before the wedding, the couple executed an antenuptial agreement.
