The jury convicted Brian Henry of selling cocaine within 1,000 feet of a public housing project, OCGA § 16-13-32.5 b. On appeal from the judgment of conviction, Henry does not contest that there was sufficient evidence that he sold the cocaine. Rather, his sole contention is that there was insufficient evidence that the sale occurred within 1,000 feet of a public housing project. We disagree and affirm. “On appeal, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict and the appellant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence; moreover, on appeal this Court determines evidence sufficiency and does not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility.” Citation and punctuation omitted. Price v. State , 281 Ga. App. 844 1 637 SE2d 468 2006. So viewed, the evidence adduced at trial showed that on the evening of August 4, 2007, two undercover agents with the State Drug Task Force were driving in an unmarked vehicle equipped with audio and video surveillance equipment. As they were driving down Troupe Street in Decatur County, they observed Henry walking down the street with another unidentified male. The agent who was driving the vehicle asked the two males if they had “$60 hard,” which was street vernacular for $60 worth of crack cocaine. Henry answered in the affirmative, but he told the agents to drive around the block and then come back to his location to complete the purchase.
After the agents drove around the block, Henry told them to park and indicated that the agent who was driving the vehicle should get out and follow him. The agent, who was wearing an audio recording device, exited from the vehicle and walked with Henry to the rear of an apartment building located at 1113 Troupe Street. The apartment building was one of several on Troupe Street owned by the Bainbridge Housing Authority for the purpose of providing public housing to low and moderate-income families.