Following a jury trial, StateStateDavidStateEdwardStatePortwas convicted of false imprisonment, simple assault, and criminal trespass. He argues on appeal that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction and that his trial counsel was ineffective. We find no error and affirm.On review from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution to determine only whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt. We do not assess witness credibility or weigh the evidence, but determine only its sufficiency.Citations omitted. Hester v. State , 287 StateStateGa.App. 434 651 SE2d 538 2007. So viewed, the evidence at trial showed that Port and the victim had been in a romantic relationship and at one time were engaged to be married. After the relationship ended, the victim communicated to Port in numerous emails, the contents of which were read to the jury at trial, that he was no longer welcome to see or contact her. The state also presented evidence that on a prior occasion, Port arrived unannounced at the victim’s home in the middle of the night and, after summoning the police, the victim told Port in the presence of the officers that he was not permitted to return to her residence.
On the day in question, Port went to the victim’s home uninvited and let himself inside. As the victim exited the bathroom, Port was standing in the hallway in front of her. Alarmed, the victim attempted to flee into an adjacent room. Port and the victim “struggled” as he attempted to prevent her from passing him. Once in the adjacent room, Port took the telephone from the victim as she tried to call 911. The victim ultimately pushed out the screen and successfully exited the residence through an open window despite Port’s attempt to pull her back inside.