DaimlerChrysler Motors Co. v. Warnell

The Court reversed the partial denial of summary judgment based on its decision in DaimlerChrysler Motors Co. v. Clemente, A08A0870; A08A0871, A08A0872 09/25/08, 08 FCDR 3085 10/10/08.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Renee M. Warnell purchased a 2002 Ford Mustang from Metro Dodge, Inc., an authorized Dodge dealership located in Snellville. Warnell was unable to obtain a permanent tag for the Mustang because Metro had not paid off the prior owner’s loan on the Mustang before selling it to Warnell. Subsequently, Warnell filed suit against Metro and several of its officers, alleging that they were liable in contract and tort for not paying off the loan and thus failing to pass her good title to the Mustang.1 Warnell later added as defendants Metro’s franchisor, DaimlerChrysler Motors Co. “Chrysler Motors”, and Metro’s primary lender and creditor, DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Americas, LLC “Chrysler Financial” based on several theories of vicarious and direct liability.2 The Chrysler Defendants moved for summary judgment, which the trial court initially denied but later granted in part. The trial court also amended its summary judgment order to exclude the testimony of Warnell’s expert witness as evidence. In Case Nos. A08A1533 and A08A1534, the Chrysler Defendants contend that the trial court erred in denying summary judgment in their favor on Warnell’s vicarious liability claims and on her direct liability claims for negligence, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, tortious interference with contract, conversion, punitive damages, and attorneys fees.

The outcome of these companion appeals is controlled by our recent decision in the substantially similar case of DaimlerChrysler Motors Co. v. Clemente , __Ga. App.__ Case Nos. A08A0870, A08A0871, and A08A0872, decided September 25, 2008. Based on the discussion and legal analysis in Clemente , we REVERSE in Case No. A08A1533 and REMAND with the instruction that the trial court enter summary judgment in favor of Chrysler Motors. We likewise REVERSE in Case No. A08A1534 and REMAND with the instruction that the trial court enter summary judgment in favor of Chrysler Financial.

DaimlerChrysler Motors Co. v. Warnell

The Court reversed the partial denial of summary judgment based on its decision in DaimlerChrysler Motors Co. v. Clemente, A08A0870; A08A0871, A08A0872 09/25/08, 08 FCDR 3085 10/10/08.

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to Daily Report