X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Following a jury trial, Jeffrey Johnson was convicted of aggravated assault, two counts of aggravated battery, and possessing a firearm during the commission of a felony. Johnson appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and the admission of similar transaction and alleged hearsay evidence. He also contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a continuance. For reasons that follow, we affirm. The standard of review on appeal of a criminal conviction is whether, after viewing the evidence in a light favorable to the verdict, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt.1 The defendant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence, and we determine only the sufficiency of the evidence.2 We do not weigh the evidence or assess witness credibility.3

So viewed, the evidence shows that Johnson lived in a building that shared a common entrance hallway with three other apartments. On July 27, 2004, Andrew Chisholm, who was 21at the time of the trial, went to the apartment building to visit another resident, using a key the resident had given him to enter the outside door to the common hallway. Johnson, who was in the hallway, asked Chisholm why he was there and told him to leave. Chisholm replied that he was there to visit another resident and refused to leave. Johnson went into his apartment, retrieved a gun, and shot Chisholm in the stomach. Chisholm dropped to his knees and then stood, and Johnson shot him again, hitting him in the arm. After Chisholm ran out of the building, Johnson followed him and fired a third shot towards him, but missed. After the shooting, Johnson returned to his apartment and resumed eating.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
May 01, 2025
Atlanta, GA

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More
March 24, 2025
New York, NY

Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.


Learn More

ABOUT THIS RECRUITMENTOur attorneys face some of the most challenging, cutting-edge legal issues in the environmental field. As such, we ar...


Apply Now ›

Hofstra University enrolls over 6,000 undergraduate students and nearly 4,000 graduate students in 13 schools, which feature a variety of de...


Apply Now ›

McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a patent associate, patent agent, or technical specialist for its Intellectual Property Prac...


Apply Now ›