Following a jury trial, Earnest Vann Davis appeals his conviction of first degree vehicular homicide1 six counts, DUI less safe,2 reckless driving,3 improper passing,4 and speeding.5 Specifically, Davis contends that the trial court erred in failing to grant him a new trial based on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We discern no error and affirm. “On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to support the verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence; moreover, an appellate court determines evidence sufficiency and does not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility.” Punctuation omitted. Eady v. State .6
So viewed, the record shows that after spending the day drinking alcoholic beverages, Davis was driving with five friends in his car. As Davis attempted to pass another car at a high rate of speed in a no-passing zone, his car collided head-on with an oncoming car driven by Patricia Turner. Turner had three daughters and a niece in her car. The collision killed Turner, her niece, one of Turner’s daughters, and three of Davis’s companions. When emergency personnel arrived and pried open the roof of Davis’s vehicle, a witness smelled an odor of alcoholic beverage, and police found containers of alcoholic beverages. A blood sample was taken with consent from Davis, who also exhibited a strong odor of alcoholic beverage, and the sample registered a .08 blood-alcohol concentration. Davis received medical treatment and was ultimately charged with first degree vehicular homicide six counts, DUI less-safe, reckless driving, improper passing, and speeding. Following his conviction on those counts7 in a jury trial, Davis moved for a new trial, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court held an evidentiary hearing and denied Davis’s motion, giving rise to this appeal.