X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Clarence Gilbert Patrick pleaded guilty to shoplifting, and the trial court sentenced him as a recidivist under OCGA § 17-10-7 c.1 In his sole enumeration of error on appeal, Patrick contends that the trial court erred in applying the general recidivist provision in OCGA § 17-10-7 c as opposed to the specific provision for shoplifting contained in OCGA § 16-8-14 b 1 C. For reasons that follow, we affirm. The underlying facts are undisputed. After Patrick was charged with shoplifting, the State filed notice of its intent to seek recidivist punishment under OCGA § 17-10-7 c. The State attached to its notice a print out of Patrick’s criminal history, which showed numerous convictions, including multiple convictions for shoplifting. However, the State did not seek enhanced punishment based upon the shoplifting convictions and instead provided certified copies of three non-shoplifting felonies. The trial court then sentenced Patrick under the general recidivist provisions, using the non-shoplifting felonies.

On appeal, Patrick argues that the trial court erred, citing Williams v. State 2 for the proposition that he should have been sentenced under OCGA § 16-8-14 b 1 C. In Williams , the defendant was tried and convicted for his fifth shoplifting offense. His prior offenses included three felony and one misdemeanor shoplifting convictions and three non-shoplifting felonies. Although the trial court sentenced Williams under OCGA § 17-10-7 c,3 we reversed, reasoning that the proper recidivist sentencing scheme was found in OCGA § 16-8-14 b 1 C,4 which deals specifically with enhanced punishment for shoplifting.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 05, 2024
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
September 06, 2024
Johannesburg

The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.


Learn More
September 12, 2024
New York, NY

Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.


Learn More

JOB DESCRIPTION SUMMARY Pulsar Title Insurance Company Inc., a commercial and residential title insurance underwriter based in the Bato...


Apply Now ›

RECRUITMENT BONUS Newly hired employees from this recruitment may be eligible to receive bonus payments up to $3,000!* FLEXIBLE SCHEDULE: ...


Apply Now ›

Morristown, NJ; New York, NY Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in multiple offices for a Counsel in our Litigation Department. The ...


Apply Now ›
06/27/2024
The American Lawyer

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
06/21/2024
Daily Business Review

Full Page Announcement


View Announcement ›