Following a bench trial, the trial court entered a judgment and final decree of divorce for Zachary Lamar Hammond Husband and Sandra S. Hammond Wife on September 15, 2006. Pursuant to this Court’s Pilot Project, see Wright v. Wright , 277 Ga. 133 587 SE2d 600 2003, Wife now appeals, contending, among other things, that the trial court erred in its calculation of her child support obligations. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in part and reverse in part. 1. Wife contends that the trial court erred by awarding custody of the parties’ two minor children to Husband. While focusing on the best interests of the child, a trial court has broad discretion in decisions awarding custody, and this Court will not interfere with any such decision absent a clear abuse of discretion. Urquhart v. Urquhart , 272 Ga. 548 1 533 SE2d 80 2000. Furthermore, “it is not an abuse of discretion if there is any evidence to support the trial judge’s decision of which party shall have custody.” Citations omitted. Cook v. Cook , 280 Ga. 768 1 632 SE2d 664 2006.
In this case, the trial court initially found that, due to working a late shift, Husband was not spending enough time with the children. Nevertheless, the trial court gave custody to Husband, at least in part to prevent disruption of the children’s schooling by requiring them to transfer from Husband’s school district to Wife’s school district. The record also shows that, although Husband was often working, Husband’s mother and grandmother assisted with the care of the children and that the children were relatively well-adjusted. Given this evidence, it can neither be said that the trial court’s decision in this case was wholly unsupported or that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding custody to Husband. Urquhart , supra, 272 Ga. at 550 1. Although Wife points to evidence in the record favorable to a finding that she should have been given custody of the children, including the recommendation of the guardian ad litem, the result in this case does not change. There was some evidence supporting the grant of custody to Husband, and, as such, the trial court’s determination in this regard must stand. Cook , supra, 280 Ga. at 778 1.
