X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Forace Brown appeals from his aggravated assault conviction and contends that: 1 insufficient evidence supports his conviction; 2 the trial court erred in its jury charge on eyewitness identification testimony; 3 the trial court allowed improper evidence of his bad character; 4 the prosecutor made an improper burden-shifting comment during closing argument; and 5 hearsay evidence was used to establish his identity as the perpetrator of the aggravated assault. We find that sufficient evidence supports Brown’s conviction, but we reverse and remand this case for a new trial based on the trial court’s erroneous charge to the jury. 1. We first address Brown’s contention that the evidence was insufficient. Construed in favor of the verdict, the evidence shows that three men asked the victim for money while she was walking home in the early morning hours. When she replied that she did not have any money, one of the men took her walking stick and beat her with it. The victim gave the police a general description of her assailant’s age, height, skin color, and clothing. She identified Brown as her assailant in court and in a pre-trial photo line-up and had no doubt about the accuracy of her identification.

This evidence sufficiently supports Brown’s conviction under the standard set forth in Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U. S. 307 99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560 1979; Hawkins v. State , 254 Ga. App. 868, 869 563 SE2d 926 2002. The victim’s identification of Brown provided direct evidence linking him to the crime, “and the credibility of the victim is solely a matter to be resolved by the jury. Cit.” Hawkins , supra.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
May 01, 2025
Atlanta, GA

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More
March 24, 2025
New York, NY

Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.


Learn More

The University of Iowa College of Law anticipates hiring lateral faculty members in the areas of Family Law and Business Law. APPLICATION ...


Apply Now ›

NY auto defense firm seeks experienced TRIAL ATTORNEY to do trials, motions, court appearances, and depositions.Salary range 115K-150K depen...


Apply Now ›

The New York State Unified Court System is one of the largest court systems in the nation with over 16,000 judges and non-judicial employees...


Apply Now ›