X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

In this mandamus action, the appellant, Dennis James, sought to have the trial court order the appellee, James Davis, the Commissioner of the Department of Vehicle Services to issue James a driver’s license. The trial court denied mandamus relief, and for the reasons that follow, we conclude that the trial court did not err. In April 2003, the Department of Motor Vehicle Safety1 declared James to be a habitual violator and revoked his driver’s license. James appealed that decision to an administrative law judge under the Administrative Procedures Act2 and the administrative judge ruled that James had been wrongly declared to be a habitual violator. After James unsuccessfully sought to have the Department of Motor Vehicle Safety issue him a driver’s license based on the administrative law judge’s ruling, he filed this mandamus action seeking to compel the Commissioner to reclassify him as a non-habitual violator and to issue him a driver’s license. As previously noted, the trial court denied mandamus relief, and James has now filed this appeal.

James contends that the administrative law judge’s decision is binding on the parties and that the trial court thus erred in failing to require Commissioner Davis to follow the administrative law judge’s ruling that James was not a habitual violator. Commissioner Davis, on the other hand, contends that the administrative law judge did not have jurisdiction to address the issue of James’s habitual violator status, and that therefore his ruling was not binding on the parties. We agree with the Commissioner’s contention.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
May 01, 2025
Atlanta, GA

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More
March 24, 2025
New York, NY

Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.


Learn More

The City of White Plains is accepting applications for two City Court Judge positions. The City Court Judge position requires an attorney wh...


Apply Now ›

Named in the 2025 edition of U.S. News - Best Lawyers "Best Law Firms" for the 15th consecutive year in both Medical Malpractice Law and Per...


Apply Now ›

Duane Morris LLP (a 900 lawyer firm with 20 plus offices across the country, and in London and Singapore) seeks an experienced commercial fi...


Apply Now ›