X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

An officer observed Omar Salmeron driving too closely behind another vehicle, and also noticed that one of the brake lights on Salmeron’s car was not functioning. The officer initiated a traffic stop and began to write a citation. Having detected a heavy odor of air freshener in the interior of the automobile, the officer suspected that Salmeron might have used it to mask the presence of alcohol or narcotics. He asked for consent to search the vehicle, and Salmeron agreed. One of the rear seats was not fastened properly and, when the officer removed it, two kilograms of cocaine were exposed. Subsequently, another kilogram of cocaine was discovered in the car. The grand jury indicted Salmeron for trafficking in the contraband. He filed a pre-trial motion to suppress, which the trial court denied. At the conclusion of a bench trial, the trial court found Salmeron guilty. On appeal, the Court of Appeals upheld the trial court’s denial of Salmeron’s motion to suppress, and affirmed his conviction. Salmeron v. State , 273 Ga. App. 55 614 SE2d 177 2005. We granted certiorari to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred by holding that law enforcement did not violate the Fourth Amendment during the traffic stop by asking Salmeron for consent to search. 1. The Fourth Amendment is not violated when, during the course of a valid traffic stop, an officer questions the driver or occupants of a vehicle and requests consent to conduct a search. The Supreme Court of the United State has “held repeatedly that mere police questioning does not constitute a seizure.” Cits. “Even when officers have no basis for suspecting a particular individual, they may generally ask questions of that individual; ask to examine the individual’s identification; and request consent to search his or her luggage.” Cit.. . . . Unless the detention was prolonged by the questioning, there is no additional seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Muehler v. Mena , 544 U. S. 93 125 SC 1465, 161 LE2d 299 2005.

Therefore, the dispositive factor in this case is not the nature or subject of the officer’s questioning, but whether that questioning took place during Salmeron’s otherwise lawful detention for committing the traffic violations in the officer’s presence. If a driver is questioned and gives consent while he is being lawfully detained during a traffic stop, there is no Fourth Amendment violation. Harris v. State , 269 Ga. App. 48 603 SE2d 476 2004. However, “a seizure that is justified solely by the interest in issuing a warning ticket to the driver can become unlawful if it is prolonged beyond the time reasonably required to complete that mission.” Illinois v. Caballes , 543 U. S.405, 407 125 SC 834, 160 LE2d 842 2005. “The officer’s purpose in an ordinary traffic stop is to enforce the laws of the roadway, and ordinarily to investigate the manner of driving with the intent to issue a citation or warning. Once the purpose of that stop has been fulfilled, the continued detention of the car and the occupants amounts to a second detention. Cit.” Cits. Daniel v. State , 277 Ga. 840, 841 1 597 SE2d 116 2004.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
May 01, 2025
Atlanta, GA

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More
March 24, 2025
New York, NY

Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.


Learn More

Boutique Law Firm in Englewood Cliffs, NJ is seeking an Experienced Commercial Real Estate/Transactional Attorney for a full-time position. ...


Apply Now ›

Boutique Law Firm in Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey is seeking a Litigation Associate NJ Bar admission required. NY admission a plus but is no...


Apply Now ›

AttorneyJob Code: LEP023Pay Grade: NFLSA Status: ExemptLegal UnitJob Description:This position reports directly to the Chief Legal Officer, ...


Apply Now ›