After a jury trial, Jamari Shamon Jenkins was found guilty of felony murder of Jesse Johnson, three counts of aggravated assault, four counts of possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime, and one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. The trial court entered judgments of conviction and sentenced Jenkins to life imprisonment for murder and to varying terms of years for the remaining offenses. A motion for new trial was denied, and he appeals.1 1. Construed most strongly in support of the verdicts, the evidence, including the testimony of several eyewitnesses, shows that Jenkins encountered a number of individuals outside the residence of Johnson’s grandmother. Jenkins began arguing with Marcel Coleman, drew a gun, and fired multiple times, fatally wounding Johnson, and also striking Calvin Coleman and Aesha Battiste. Jenkins, who denied any involvement in the shooting, contends that the only witness who claimed to see him fire a gun, Calvin Coleman, lacked credibility because he left the scene, failed to call the police, gave false information at the hospital concerning his injuries, and admitted that he had a prior difficulty with the defendant. Actually, however, Marcel Coleman also testified that he saw Jenkins fire the shots. Ms. Battiste saw Jenkins, and no one else, draw a gun, and ballistic tests confirmed that she and Johnson were shot by the same weapon. Moreover, ” ‘it was for the jury to assess the credibility of the witnesses, resolve any conflicts in the evidence, and come to a determination of the facts. Cits.’ Cit.” McLeod v. State , 271 Ga. 455 520 SE2d 692 1999. When construed most strongly in support of the verdicts, the evidence was sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find Jenkins guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes for which he was convicted. Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U. S. 307 99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560 1979.
2. The trial court’s refusal to give a requested charge on grave suspicion is enumerated as error. The evidence at trial, including the testimony that Jenkins was the shooter, raised more than a grave suspicion of his guilt. Hodo v. State , 272 Ga. 272, 275 6 528 SE2d 250 2000; Estep v. State , 181 Ga. App. 842, 844 2 b 353 SE2d 913 1987. Furthermore, the trial court gave complete instructions on reasonable doubt and presumption of innocence. Hodo v. State , supra at 276 6; Lowe v. State , 267 Ga. 180, 181 2 476 SE2d 583 1996. Thus, the trial court did not err in refusing to give the requested charge.
