X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

This matter is before the Court on the Notice of Discipline filed by the State Bar against Respondent Marshall L. Cohen in which it alleged that Cohen violated Rules 1.1; 1.3; 1.4; 1.5; 3.3; 5.5; and 8.4 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct. See Bar Rule 4-102 d. The State Bar filed a motion for default as Cohen did not file a Notice of Rejection within 30 days after the proper service by publication of the Notice of Discipline. See Bar Rule 4-208.3 a. Cohen did file an untimely Notice of Rejection but because it was not timely filed, Cohen is in default, has no right to an evidentiary hearing and is subject to such discipline as may be determined by this Court. See Bar Rule 4-208.1 b. The State Bar recommends a one-year suspension with conditions for reinstatement. For the reasons discussed below, we reject the State Bar’s recommendation and disbar Cohen from the practice of law. The facts as deemed admitted by Cohen’s default show that he is a resident of Florida who has been on inactive status with the Georgia State Bar since 1983. Despite not being an active member of the State Bar, Cohen undertook representation of a client in a criminal case pending in Georgia. The client paid Cohen $2,500 and Cohen told the client that he was licensed to practice law in Georgia without disclosing his inactive status. Cohen failed to appear at the arraignment and calendar call in the case although he sent a notice of appearance and filed a motion for continuance both received and filed after the arraignment. The trial court entered an order forfeiting the client’s bond and issued a bench warrant for the client’s arrest for failure to appear at the arraignment. The client subsequently surrendered to authorities after calling Cohen several times about the warrant, which calls Cohen did not return. Cohen eventually agreed to meet in Florida with the client, prior to his surrender, but Cohen did not appear for the meeting and later told his client that he could not come to Georgia until more than a month later. Cohen then filed a motion to set aside the bench warrant and bond forfeiture. The client discharged Cohen and sought a refund of the fees paid, but Cohen neither responded nor returned the fees. Cohen filed a motion to withdraw from the case and to allow bond. In none of the filings with the superior court did Cohen reveal that he was on inactive status and thus not eligible to practice law in Georgia. Cohen ignored a second request for a refund and the client thereafter hired different counsel authorized to practice law in Georgia and resolved his case.

These facts establish that Cohen violated the following provisions of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct: Rule 1.1 by providing incompetent representation; Rule 1.3 by wilfully abandoning a legal matter entrusted to him to the detriment of his client; Rule 1.4 by failing to communicate with his client; Rule 1.5 by charging an unreasonable fee, providing virtually no services and refusing to make a refund; Rule 3.3 by making false representations to the trial court regarding his eligibility to practice law in Georgia; Rule 5.5 by engaging in the unauthorized practice of law; and Rule 8.4 by engaging in professional conduct involving deceit and misrepresentation. Of these Rules, the maximum penalty for violating Rules 1.1; 1.3; 3.3; and 8.4 is disbarment. As discussed above, Cohen’s conduct in this matter demonstrates a complete disregard of the obligations and responsibilities owed by attorneys both to their clients and to the legal profession. Accordingly, Marshall L. Cohen is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in this state. He is reminded of his duties under Rule 4-219 c 1.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
May 01, 2025
Atlanta, GA

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More
March 24, 2025
New York, NY

Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.


Learn More

Our client, a thriving personal injury firm known for its commitment to compassionate client care is seeking an attorney with 5+ years of ex...


Apply Now ›

McCarter and English s Chambers-ranked Government Contracts group is seeking an experienced, diligent, and proactive government contracts as...


Apply Now ›

The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a central staff attorney vacancy. A regular ful...


Apply Now ›