After a jury trial, Appellant Milton Henry was found guilty of the malice murder of Harvey Kent, Jr. and aggravated assault against Bernice Henry. The trial court entered judgments of conviction and sentenced Appellant to life imprisonment without parole for murder and a concurrent 20-year term for aggravated assault. Appellant’s motion for new trial was denied, and he appeals.1 1. Construed in support of the verdicts, the evidence shows that Ms. Henry was Appellant’s estranged wife and that she had developed a relationship with Kent. After leaving Ms. Henry’s apartment and walking to Kent’s apartment, Appellant angrily confronted Kent about his relationship with Ms. Henry, chased him, and fatally stabbed him three times in the chest. Upon returning to Ms. Henry’s apartment, Appellant stabbed her in the head, nearly severing a portion of her ear. He subsequently bragged about his actions. Although Appellant testified that the victim had a knife and was the aggressor, the evidence was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find that Appellant did not act in self-defense and that he was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of malice murder and aggravated assault. Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.307 99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560 1979; Canada v. State , 275 Ga. 131, 132 1 562 SE2d 508 2002.
2. Appellant contends that the State failed to prove venue beyond a reasonable doubt. The evidence shows that the crimes occurred in an apartment complex located at 900 Conley Road, and that this section of Conley Road is in Fulton County. This is not a case where a crime scene was described but its location left unspecified, or where a street address alone was offered as proof of venue without reference to a city or county. Cits. In this case, as shown above, the crime scene was identified as being an apartment complex at a particular address. Schofield v. State , 261 Ga. App. 70, 71 582 SE2d 11 2003. “Testimony that a certain site is on a specific street and that the street is in a particular county is some proof that the site is in that county.” Robinson v. State , 275 Ga. 143, 144 2 561 SE2d 823 2002. Thus, “testimony was given which supported the fact that the crime scene, and the specified address, was in Fulton County.” Schofield v. State , supra. “The logical import of the . . . testimony here . . . is that the crime scene itself was in Fulton County.” Robinson v. State , supra. Since Appellant has not offered any evidence to the contrary, we hold that the State met its burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that venue is properly in Fulton County. Robinson v. State , supra.
