James Stewart Odom was convicted of malice murder, aggravated assault, armed robbery, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime in connection with the stabbing death of Buford Evans, and he was also convicted of theft by conversion of a car belonging to Beverly Conway.1 He appeals pursuant to the grant of his motion for an out-of-time appeal, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the crimes committed against Evans only. Finding no error, we affirm. The jury was authorized to find from the evidence adduced at trial that Odom borrowed a car from a friend. When he did not return with the car, the friend swore out a warrant. While searching for the vehicle, the police ultimately discovered that, on the day of the crimes, Odom and his co-defendant, Bobby Gray, had been smoking crack cocaine and drinking until their money ran out. Odom and Gray then drove to Evans’s home. While there, Evans was stabbed to death and his wallet and checkbook were stolen. Odom and Gray then spent the stolen money on more drugs.
Although Odom admits to being at the victim’s home and sustaining an injury to his hand from the knife used to kill the victim, he claims that the crimes were committed solely by Gray. Based on this contention, Odom argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. “Every person concerned in the commission of a crime , however, is a party thereto and may be charged with and convicted of commission of the crime.” OCGA § 16-2-20 a. Therefore, contrary to Odom’s assertion, there was ample evidence adduced that he either committed the crimes or was a party to the crimes, see OCGA § 16-2-20 b, and the evidence was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307 99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560 1979.
