Sign In
Events
Newsletters
Search

Close

Close Search

Cancel

SEARCH
MY LAW.COMNEW

Odom v. State

The defendant admitted that he was at the victim's home and injured himself with the murder weapon.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

James Stewart Odom was convicted of malice murder, aggravated assault, armed robbery, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime in connection with the stabbing death of Buford Evans, and he was also convicted of theft by conversion of a car belonging to Beverly Conway.1 He appeals pursuant to the grant of his motion for an out-of-time appeal, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the crimes committed against Evans only. Finding no error, we affirm. The jury was authorized to find from the evidence adduced at trial that Odom borrowed a car from a friend. When he did not return with the car, the friend swore out a warrant. While searching for the vehicle, the police ultimately discovered that, on the day of the crimes, Odom and his co-defendant, Bobby Gray, had been smoking crack cocaine and drinking until their money ran out. Odom and Gray then drove to Evans’s home. While there, Evans was stabbed to death and his wallet and checkbook were stolen. Odom and Gray then spent the stolen money on more drugs.

Although Odom admits to being at the victim’s home and sustaining an injury to his hand from the knife used to kill the victim, he claims that the crimes were committed solely by Gray. Based on this contention, Odom argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. “Every person concerned in the commission of a crime , however, is a party thereto and may be charged with and convicted of commission of the crime.” OCGA § 16-2-20 a. Therefore, contrary to Odom’s assertion, there was ample evidence adduced that he either committed the crimes or was a party to the crimes, see OCGA § 16-2-20 b, and the evidence was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307 99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560 1979.

Trending Stories

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

LEARN MORE

More From ALM

Premium Subscription
With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Team Accounts
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Bundle Subscriptions
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
Go to CLE Center
Southeastern Legal Awards 2025
May 01, 2025
Atlanta, GA

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
GlobeSt. Healthcare Real Estate 2024
December 02, 2024 - December 03, 2024
Scottsdale, AZ

Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!


Learn More
ThinkAdvisor LUMINARIES Awards 2024
December 11, 2024
Las Vegas, NV

This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.


Learn More
Go to Events Go to Webcasts
(NEW) JUNIOR-MID LEVEL LITIGATION ASSOCIATE WANTED FOR ELITE LITIGATION BOUTIQUE FIRM (Atlanta, GA)

Our client, a boutique litigation firm established by former BigLaw partners, is seeking to hire a junior-mid level associate their rapidly ...


Apply Now ›
CORPORATE ASSOCIATE - CT or Remote

Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking an associate to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates must have four to eight years...


Apply Now ›
Senior Associate - Boutique -A&D (NYC)

SENIOR ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY, BOUTIQUE LAW FIRM, CORPORATE LAW We provide strategic advisory and legal services to the world's leading archite...


Apply Now ›
Go to Lawjobs