X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The appellant, Gerald Davis, appeals from the trial court’s ruling that his petition for mandamus relief was moot. For the reasons that follow, we reverse. In April 2004, Davis was indicted for speeding and weaving, and he filed a demand for speedy trial under OCGA § 17-7-170. In December 2004, Davis filed a motion for discharge and acquittal, contending that the State had not complied with his demand for speedy trial. On January 4, 2005, the appellee, Judge Thomas H. Wilson, entered an order of nolle prosequi on Davis’s case. In March 2005, Davis filed the present petition for writ of mandamus in which he prayed that the court issue an order directing Judge Wilson to enter an order on his motion for discharge and acquittal. In June 2005, the trial court ruled that Davis’s petition for writ of mandamus was moot because of the entry of the nolle prosequi.

Contrary to the trial court’s ruling, however, the entry of a nolle prosequi does not render moot a defendant’s motion for discharge and acquittal based on the State’s failure to comply with a demand for speedy trial.1 One reason for this rule is that, after a nolle prosequi, the State may reindict a defendant for the crimes at issue “within the applicable statute of limitations or within six months after the entry of the nolle prosequi if that occurs later.”2 Thus, here, the State still has the authority to reindict Davis for speeding and weaving.3

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
May 01, 2025
Atlanta, GA

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More
March 24, 2025
New York, NY

Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.


Learn More

SALARY: $8,000.69 Biweekly$17,334.83 Monthly$208,017.95 AnnuallyOPENING DATE: 01/29/2025CLOSING DATE: 02/27/2025 11:59 PM PacificDEFINITION/...


Apply Now ›

Our client is seeking to hire a supervisory attorney for their growing Alabama team. Qualified candidates will have 8+ years of litigation...


Apply Now ›

Our client , is seeking to hire a mid-senior attorney for their growing Alabama team. Qualified candidates will have 4+ years of litigatio...


Apply Now ›