In re Perry

In 1992, this Court granted respondent Raymond Peery’s petition for voluntary suspension of his license to practice law in Georgia pending his appeal of his conviction in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska for money laundering and felony theft from a program receiving federal funds. In the Matter of Peery , 262 Ga. 425 422 SE2d 1 1992. Respondent admitted in his petition that his conviction constituted a violation of Standard 66 of Rule 4-102d of the Rules and Regulations of the State Bar of Georgia. Id. Since the time of his suspension, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has affirmed the judgment of conviction entered against Peery and the United States Supreme Court has denied his petition for a writ of certiorari. Peery v. United States , 507 U.S. 946 113 SC 1354, 122 LE2d 734 1993. Following the conclusion of Peery’s appeals, a special master conducted a hearing pursuant to Bar Rule 4-106f to determine the appropriate level of punishment for Peery’s violation of Standard 66. The special master found that Peery had been convicted of felonies and his appeals had been exhausted, and concluded that Respondent should be disbarred for the violation of Standard 66. The special master’s report was filed in accordance with Bar Rule 4-217c and both the State Bar and Peery have waived any right to file exception with this Court or request oral argument since neither party requested a Review Panel review pursuant to Rule 4-217d.