Mercker v. Abend

The trial court did not err in charging the jury on hindsight where the evidence raised an issue of whether or not the plaintiff based her claims on later acquired knowledge or on information known by or reasonably available to the defendant at the time of plaintiff's laparoscopic gallbladder surgery.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Dr. Melvin Abend performed laparoscopic surgery on Suzanne Estee Mercker to remove her gallbladder in treatment for gallstones. Because of persistent bile leakage thereafter, Mercker underwent multiple repair surgeries. She filed a medical malpractice suit against Abend and his professional corporation, Melvin N. Abend, M.D., P.C., alleging they were liable for permanent damage to her biliary system. A jury found in favor of the defendants. Mercker appeals, contending that the trial court erred in charging the jury. Because Mercker has demonstrated no reversible error, we affirm. During a laparoscopic cholecystectomy on Mercker on August 4, 1998, Abend unintentionally perforated the cystic duct. Because bile began to leak from the hole, Abend realized what he had done. He testified that “the cystic duct was transected in the process of the gallbladder removal at the level that the hole was.” He left a bile drainage tube in the area of the cystic duct. Abend testified that he did so “not because of the perforation of the cystic duct per se,” but “as part of the overall assessment,” which included a coarse, thickened gallbladder, the difficulty of the dissection, and abdominal adhesions. Before discharging Mercker from the hospital on August 5, Abend assured her that the tube was there because there might be some leakage, but that it would heal within a few days.

But on August 11, Mercker reported to Abend that bile continued to leak. Tests performed the next day revealed blockage of the bile duct, but not the source of the leakage. On August 13, Abend performed open repair surgery and discovered that during the cholecystectomy, he had erroneously placed a clip on the common bile duct, cut the common hepatic duct, and cut an accessory duct. According to Abend, he corrected those errors during the repair surgery.

Mercker v. Abend

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to Daily Report