X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

On July 10, 2002, McCorvey Development, Inc. filed a notice of appeal from a Gwinnett Superior Court judgment in favor of Jenkins Development Corporation in this contract action. The clerk of court mailed McCorvey’s counsel a bill of costs, which counsel received on July 15, 2002. On September 6, 2002, fifty-three days later, the trial court dismissed sua sponte McCorvey’s notice of appeal for failure to pay costs and failure to request an extension of time to pay costs. McCorvey appeals from this dismissal, contending the trial court erred in dismissing the notice of appeal without conducting a hearing to determine whether the delay in paying costs was inexcusable and that whether such failure unreasonably delayed the transmission of the record to this Court. McCorvey also cites as error the trial court’s failure to make specific findings on this issue. Because we find McCorvey was entitled to a hearing and findings on this issue, we reverse and remand this case to the trial court with direction. Under OCGA § 5-6-48 c, the trial court may dismiss an appeal, after notice and an opportunity for a hearing, where there has been an unreasonable delay in the filing of the transcript and it is shown that the delay was inexcusable and was caused by such party. In like manner, the trial court may order the appeal dismissed where there has been an unreasonable delay in the transmission of the record to the appellate court, and it is seen that the delay was inexcusable and was caused by the failure of a party to pay costs in the trial court or file an affidavit of indigence. See also Holy Fellowship Church of God in Christ v. First Community Bank of Henry County , 242 Ga. App. 400, 403 530 SE2d 24 2000 dismissal of an appeal by the trial court is not authorized absent a hearing and a finding that the delay was both unreasonable and inexcusable; see also Baker v. Southern Railway Co. , 260 Ga. 115, 116 390 SE2d 576 1990 appellant’s failure to apply for an extension to file a notice of appeal is not enough to justify the dismissal of appeal absent a finding that the appellant’s actions were inexcusable and caused an unreasonable delay in filing a transcript; Wagner v. Howell , 257 Ga. 801-802 363 SE2d 759 1988 dismissal is not authorized unless such delay was unreasonable, inexcusable, and caused by the appealing party.

The appellee in this case correctly argues that this Court has previously found “that a delay of more than 30 days in paying costs is prima facie unreasonable and inexcusable.” Citation omitted. Bouldin v. Parker , 173 Ga. App. 526 327 SE2d 760 1985. See also Jones v. State , 123 Ga. App. 672 182 SE2d 190 1971 45-day delay was unreasonable and inexcusable. Even so, such a delay is not conclusively unreasonable or inexcusable and may be rebutted by evidence presented by the opposing party at a hearing on the issue. Leonard v. Ognio , 201 Ga. App. 260, 261 410 SE2d 814 1991; Unifund General v. Orr , 191 Ga. App. 836, 837 1 383 SE2d 199 1989. After the trial court makes factual determinations based upon the evidence presented at the hearing, it has broad discretion to decide whether the case should be dismissed due to an inexcusable delay in paying costs. Such decision will not be disturbed by this Court in the absence of an abuse of discretion. Leonard v. Ognio , 201 Ga. App. at 261.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
October 15, 2024
Los Angeles, CA

Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!


Learn More
October 15, 2024
Los Angeles, CA

Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.


Learn More
October 15, 2024
Dallas, TX

The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.


Learn More

Mid sized NYC Personal Injury Defense Firm seeking to immediately hire several attorneys to join our firm. Preferred candidates are those w...


Apply Now ›

Mid-size Parsippany based law firm with a statewide practice is searching for a full-time motivated associate litigation attorney with 3-5 y...


Apply Now ›

Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in Princeton, NJ for an associate in the Litigation Department. The ideal candidate will have tw...


Apply Now ›