In the Interest of M. V.

The Whitfield County Juvenile Court terminated the parental rights of the natural mother of M. V., R. V., and J. V. In her sole enumeration of error, the mother argues that the juvenile court lacked clear and convincing evidence that her rights should be terminated.1 We disagree and thus affirm.

In reviewing a juvenile court’s termination of parental rights, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to that court’s decision, and we will affirm if the record demonstrates that any rational trier of fact could have found by clear and convincing evidence that the parent’s right to custody has been lost.2 So viewed, the record shows that the mother had four children, M. V., R. M., J. V., and K. G. In April 1999, before K. G. was born, the Department of Children and Family Services DFACS became involved with the mother’s family after receiving a report that M. V. and R. M. had bruises. According to the report, the bruises were believed to have been caused by Moises Garcia, the mother’s live-in boyfriend, who had fathered the two youngest children, J. V. and K. G.3 A DFACS investigator interviewed Garcia and the mother, who both denied injuring the children.