X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

On June 19, 1999, Craig Catrett purchased a 1999 Dodge Dakota truck from Landmark Dodge, Inc. “Landmark”. Approximately fourteen months later, Catrett sued Landmark for fraud, recission, and violation of the Fair Business Practices Act and the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, alleging that the dealership fraudulently induced him to purchase the truck by misrepresenting its condition. Landmark moved for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. Catrett appeals, and for reasons that follow, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact remains and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.1 On appeal from a grant of summary judgment, a de novo standard of review applies, ” ‘and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.’ “ 2 Viewed in this light, the evidence shows that Catrett purchased the truck with approximately 4,700 miles on it. According to Catrett’s verified complaint,3 a Landmark salesman represented that the truck, which had a new car price information sticker inside it, was a ” ‘demonstrator’ ” that had been on Landmark’s lot “ for some time.” As defined by Landmark’s general manager, “a ‘demonstrator’ is a new car which has been driven by dealership personnel but not yet titled.”

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 05, 2024
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
September 06, 2024
Johannesburg

The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.


Learn More
September 12, 2024
New York, NY

Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.


Learn More

Our client, a boutique litigation firm established by former BigLaw partners, is seeking to hire a commercial litigation associate to join e...


Apply Now ›

COLE SCHOTZ P.C.Prominent mid Atlantic law firm with multiple regional office locations seeks a senior attorney with commercial real estate ...


Apply Now ›

ATTORNEYS/PARALEGALS ROCKLAND/BERGEN COUNTYKantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman, P.C. Expanding and established multi-practice ...


Apply Now ›
06/27/2024
The American Lawyer

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
06/21/2024
Daily Business Review

Full Page Announcement


View Announcement ›
06/14/2024
New Jersey Law Journal

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›