X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Defendant Brian Cosby was convicted following a jury trial of armed robbery. He appeals, contending in his sole enumeration of error that the trial court erred by admitting, over objection, the non-redacted statements of two non-testifying co-defendants. We agree that the admission of this evidence was error, and reverse.

Cosby, Antwan Estelle, Jermaine Baker, Carlos Wood and Dwyatt Ware were charged with the armed robbery of a convenience store. The evidence showed that the five men, along with Baker’s girlfriend who was not charged, traveled from Heflin, Alabama, near the Georgia-Alabama border line to Georgia in two cars. They talked, or according to their trial testimony or statements to police introduced at trial, “joked” about committing a robbery. They eventually arrived at a Starvin Marvin convenience store in Carrollton, Georgia. Cosby, Estelle and Wood parked in front of the store and Baker and Ware, who were traveling in the other car, parked near the store in another lot. Cosby entered the store and attempted to purchase some cigars, but the clerk would not allow the purchase because he did not have proof of age. Cosby told the clerk he would just purchase a soft drink and the clerk pointed the way to the soft drinks and Cosby removed one from the cooler and was returning to the counter. At this point, Ware entered the store with a gun and ordered the clerk to give him money. The clerk complied, and Ware “ran across the field and jumped into the car with Baker” and they drove back to Alabama. Cosby walked out of the store and got in the car with Estelle and Wood. Estelle told police he did not believe Cosby when he told him Ware had robbed the store, and that Cosby stated “I thought the fool was joking, man. This fool for real this time.”

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
May 01, 2025
Atlanta, GA

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More
March 24, 2025
New York, NY

Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.


Learn More

ABOUT THIS RECRUITMENTOur attorneys face some of the most challenging, cutting-edge legal issues in the environmental field. As such, we ar...


Apply Now ›

Hofstra University enrolls over 6,000 undergraduate students and nearly 4,000 graduate students in 13 schools, which feature a variety of de...


Apply Now ›

McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a patent associate, patent agent, or technical specialist for its Intellectual Property Prac...


Apply Now ›