X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

We granted cert. in this workers compensation case to determine whether the Court of Appeals properly found that the failure to have a “maximum medical improvement” or “MMI” determination tolled the statute of limitation for filing a change of condition claim under workers’ compensation. City of Poulan v. Hodge, 251 Ga. App. 500 __SE2d__ 2001 Andrews, P.J., concurring in judgment only. This case involves application of the version of OCGA § 34-9-104 b in effect before 1990 in those factual situations where a health care provider failed to indicate on a workers’ compensation form whether or not an injured worker had attained his or her “maximum medical improvement.”

Prior to 1990, the two-year statute of limitation in OCGA § 34-9-104 b for filing a change of condition claim began to run only upon “the final payment of income benefits due under this chapter.”1 This phrase was interpreted by the Court of Appeals in MARTA v. Ledbetter, 184 Ga. App. 518 361 SE2d 878 1987, which held that in determining what benefits may be “due” a claimant, “what is meant . . . is not that the type of disability may arise in the future, but rather that there is evidence that it existed at the time although no claim was made for it.” Id. at 519. The dissent in Ledbetter charged that this interpretation “emasculated” the limitations period, in that “a worker could wait 10 or 20 or 30 or even 50 years before filing a change in condition claim.” Id. at 520 Deen, P.J., dissenting, joined by Carley and Sognier, JJ. This Court denied cert. in Ledbetter. 184 Ga. App. 910.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
May 01, 2025
Atlanta, GA

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More
March 24, 2025
New York, NY

Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.


Learn More

SALARY: $8,000.69 Biweekly$17,334.83 Monthly$208,017.95 AnnuallyOPENING DATE: 01/29/2025CLOSING DATE: 02/27/2025 11:59 PM PacificDEFINITION/...


Apply Now ›

Our client is seeking to hire a supervisory attorney for their growing Alabama team. Qualified candidates will have 8+ years of litigation...


Apply Now ›

Our client , is seeking to hire a mid-senior attorney for their growing Alabama team. Qualified candidates will have 4+ years of litigatio...


Apply Now ›