X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

In Ward v. DHR,1 we affirmed an order of the Superior Court of Henry County directing Cindy Ward to pay child support for her noncustodial minor child. After granting certiorari, the Supreme Court reversed our decision.2

The facts of this case are fully set forth in our prior opinion and need not be detailed here. For present purposes, we reiterate that DHR filed a petition at the behest of Ward’s ex-husband seeking the establishment of a support obligation from Ward. On appeal, we held that 1 a 1991 divorce decree had already established child support obligations for Ward with respect to her noncustodial child; 2 DHR had erroneously filed a petition to establish a support obligation where one already existed, rather than following the procedures set forth in OCGA § 19-11-12 for modifying a support obligation; and 3 DHR’s error was harmless because Ward received notice and a full and fair hearing in the superior court. The Supreme Court affirmed our first two holdings, but not the third. Instead, the Court ruled that under § 19-11-12, DHR may “file modification actions on behalf of children not receiving public assistance only in cases where DHR can show the child’s need for additional support.” Because DHR failed to make that showing in this case, the Supreme Court disagreed that DHR’s erroneous procedure was harmless.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
May 01, 2025
Atlanta, GA

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More
March 24, 2025
New York, NY

Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.


Learn More

SALARY: $8,000.69 Biweekly$17,334.83 Monthly$208,017.95 AnnuallyOPENING DATE: 01/29/2025CLOSING DATE: 02/27/2025 11:59 PM PacificDEFINITION/...


Apply Now ›

Our client is seeking to hire a supervisory attorney for their growing Alabama team. Qualified candidates will have 8+ years of litigation...


Apply Now ›

Our client , is seeking to hire a mid-senior attorney for their growing Alabama team. Qualified candidates will have 4+ years of litigatio...


Apply Now ›