X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The “three corporate officers or employees of S. I. D., Inc.”1 directly appeal the superior court’s order denying their joint motion to quash the DeKalb County special grand jury’s subpoena duces tecum upon S. I. D., Inc. for certain corporate records. The order appealed allows the subpoena, which was properly served upon the corporation’s custodian of records, to stand. The superior court concluded that neither the corporation nor its corporate officers may claim a privilege in or against the production of S. I. D., Inc.’s corporate records. For the following reasons, we must dismiss this appeal.

The denial of a motion to quash a grand jury subpoena is not a final order, and because S. I. D., Inc. and its corporate officers failed to follow the interlocutory appeal procedure, we lack jurisdiction to consider the merits of this appeal. An order denying a motion to quash a grand jury subpoena is not a final order within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-34 a. See Cobbledick v. United States, 309 U. S. 323, 327-328 60 SC 540, 84 LE 783 1940. An appeal from such an order must be made by application, pursuant to the interlocutory appeal procedure set forth in OCGA § 5-5-34 b. See Morris v. State, 246 Ga. 510 272 SE2d 254 1980. Or, the party subpoenaed may refuse to comply with the court’s order, litigate the issue in a contempt proceeding, and then directly appeal the finding of contempt. See Cobbledick, 309 U. S. at 328; Johnson & Johnson v. Kaufman, 226 Ga. App. 77, 81 485 SE2d 525 1997.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
October 15, 2024
Los Angeles, CA

Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!


Learn More
October 15, 2024
Los Angeles, CA

Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.


Learn More
October 15, 2024
Dallas, TX

The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.


Learn More

Mid sized NYC Personal Injury Defense Firm seeking to immediately hire several attorneys to join our firm. Preferred candidates are those w...


Apply Now ›

Mid-size Parsippany based law firm with a statewide practice is searching for a full-time motivated associate litigation attorney with 3-5 y...


Apply Now ›

Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in Princeton, NJ for an associate in the Litigation Department. The ideal candidate will have tw...


Apply Now ›