Mills v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co.

Since federal regulations require the same warnings from all railroad crossing automatic warning devices, evidence that some of railroad's devices previously gave delayed warnings was admissible in plaintiff's wrongful death suit alleging that crossing device gave a delayed warning.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

This case comes on appeal after the trial court granted a new trial on special grounds to Norfolk Southern Railway Company1 on the train-vehicle collision that occurred when the automatic warning devices at the crossing failed to timely activate before the vehicle entered the crossing. The special ground for the grant stated that testimony as to prior notice of the gravity of danger from activation failures of automatic crossing warning devices, evidenced by similar occurrences, should not have been admitted, because each such occurrence had not been shown to be substantially similar by a separate evidentiary foundation for each occurrence. Federal regulations, however, mandated that all automatic warning devices provide the same minimum standard of configuration and performance for all such automatic warning devices at all crossings so that each performs the same. See 49 C. F. R. § 234.12 ; 59 FR 50105. Thus we hold that all the prior similar occurrences had sufficient substantial similarity to the activation failure in this case to be relevant and material for admission into evidence, because all automatic warning devices had to perform to a minimum federal standard, creating substantial similarity in function as to all other automatic warning devices, as well as to the duty of the train crews when a failure occurred. See 49 C. F. R. § 234. The trial court’s grant of a new trial on this special ground requires reversal as a matter of law.

James William Mills and Lorraine Mills Stephens3 brought this wrongful death action. The collision killed Christopher Mills and Patrick Mills, the minor children of James and Vanlie Pearl Mills, now deceased.

Mills v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co.

Since federal regulations require the same warnings from all railroad crossing automatic warning devices, evidence that some of railroad's devices previously gave delayed warnings was admissible in plaintiff's wrongful death suit alleging that crossing device gave a delayed warning.

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to Daily Report