X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether retroactive application of Rule 475-3-.05 2 of the Board of Pardons and Paroles, allowing the Board to extend the interval between parole reconsiderations up to a period of eight years for an inmate serving a life sentence,1 violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. The trial court held that it does. Subsequently, the United States Supreme Court decided Garner v. Jones2 in which it held that Rule 475-3-.05 2 does not inherently create a “significant risk of prolonging an inmate’s incarceration”3 and, therefore, does not facially violate the Ex Post Facto Clause. That Court further held that absent a demonstration by an inmate “that as applied to his own sentence the Rule creates a significant risk of increasing his punishment,”4 the Ex Post Facto Clause is not implicated. Because Jacobs has not shown that retrospective application of the Rule to his sentence creates a significant risk of increased punishment, we reverse.

Charlie Jacobs was convicted of murder in 1971 and sentenced to the death penalty. In 1972 his sentence was commuted to life imprisonment. Jacobs first became eligible for parole in 1978.5 Between 1978 and 1995 his parole reviews were considered on an annual basis and denied. In 1995 the Board notified Jacobs that in accordance with Rule 475-3-.05 2, as amended to afford a parole review at least every eight years,6 his next parole review would occur in 2001.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 05, 2024
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
September 06, 2024
Johannesburg

The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.


Learn More
September 12, 2024
New York, NY

Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.


Learn More

JOB DESCRIPTION SUMMARY Pulsar Title Insurance Company Inc., a commercial and residential title insurance underwriter based in the Bato...


Apply Now ›

RECRUITMENT BONUS Newly hired employees from this recruitment may be eligible to receive bonus payments up to $3,000!* FLEXIBLE SCHEDULE: ...


Apply Now ›

Morristown, NJ; New York, NY Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in multiple offices for a Counsel in our Litigation Department. The ...


Apply Now ›
06/27/2024
The American Lawyer

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
06/21/2024
Daily Business Review

Full Page Announcement


View Announcement ›