Stokes v. Edwards

Plaintiff could not file a writ of prohibition challenging superior court's decision reversing the dismissal of petition to remove him from school board, since court had jurisdiction over that administrative appeal and he had a legal remedy in the form of appellate review.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The Griffin-Spalding County Board of Education Board filed a petition with the Governor pursuant to the Code of Ethics for Members of Boards, Commissions, and Authorities OCGA § 45-10-3 et seq. Code of Ethics for the removal of Oscar Stokes, Jr. from his position as a member of the Board. Based on the recommendation of an administrative law judge, the Governor entered an order dismissing the petition on jurisdictional grounds. Upon judicial review of that decision, the superior court reversed the order and remanded the matter to the Governor. Stokes’s application for discretionary review of that judgment by the Court of Appeals was denied, and a direct appeal to this Court was dismissed on a procedural ground. Stokes then filed with this Court a petition for writ of prohibition against the trial court judge, which was dismissed under Brown v. Johnson, 251 Ga. 436 306 SE2d 655 1983. Stokes next filed a petition for writ of prohibition against the trial judge in Spalding County Superior Court. The denial of that petition is the subject of this appeal.

The writ of prohibition “is a writ to prevent a tribunal possessing judicial powers from exercising jurisdiction over matters not within its cognizance, or from exceeding its jurisdiction in matters of which it has cognizance. Cits.” Martin v. Crawford, 199 Ga. 497 34 SE2d 699 1945. See, e.g., Ormond v. Ball, 120 Ga. 916 48 SE 383 1904, holding that the writ would lie to enjoin a citation of contempt entered by a justice of the peace in excess of that official’s power. The writ is available only where the court sought to be restrained lacks subject-matter jurisdiction or acts in excess of its jurisdiction, and is not generally available for the relief of grievances which may be redressed in the ordinary course of judicial proceedings. Henry v. James, 264 Ga. 527 2 449 SE2d 79 1994.

Stokes v. Edwards

Plaintiff could not file a writ of prohibition challenging superior court's decision reversing the dismissal of petition to remove him from school board, since court had jurisdiction over that administrative appeal and he had a legal remedy in the form of appellate review.

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to Daily Report