X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The dispute in this case arises from the proposed development of the 47 acres of land surrounding the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority MARTA Lindbergh Station. MARTA initiated the project by issuing a Request For Proposal RFP, which solicited plans from prospective developers. The RFP did not include the submission of bids as a criterion for selection and did not express MARTA’s intention to dispose of the property. Instead, MARTA noted its preference for a ground lease, but its willingness to consider other business arrangements. Although the RFP did not state that MARTA would make any capital contribution, MARTA subsequently committed $ 40 million of its funds toward improvement of the property. The size of the development, including the density, was left open for negotiation. Two developers submitted proposals and, after negotiations, MARTA selected Carter & Associates Carter. Appellants oppose the project and brought suit to prevent MARTA from implementing its agreement with Carter. After conducting a hearing, the trial court denied Appellants’ motion for an interlocutory injunction, and they appeal from that ruling.

1. The trial court based its denial of injunctive relief upon several findings, one of which was Appellants’ failure to show “a substantial likelihood that they will succeed on the merits of their claims.” Appellants urge that the trial court erred in requiring that they make such a showing as a prerequisite to obtaining a preliminary injunction.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
July 11, 2024
New York, NY

The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.


Learn More
July 22, 2024 - July 24, 2024
Lake Tahoe, CA

GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.


Learn More
August 12, 2024 - August 13, 2024
Sydney, New South Wales

General Counsel Summit is the premier event for in-house counsel, hosting esteemed legal minds from all sectors of the economy.


Learn More

COLE SCHOTZ P.C. TRUSTS & ESTATES ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT: NEW JERSEY OR NEW YORK OFFICES: Prominent mid-Atlantic la...


Apply Now ›

Post & Schell's Casualty Litigation Department is currently seeking an attorney with 2- 4 years of litigation experience, preferably in ...


Apply Now ›

A client focused Atlanta Personal Injury Law Firm is seeking an experienced, highly motivated, and enthusiastic personal injury attorney who...


Apply Now ›
06/21/2024
Daily Business Review

Full Page Announcement


View Announcement ›
06/14/2024
New Jersey Law Journal

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›