Shawn Swantner appeals from the superior court’s order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea to one count of sale of cocaine, one count of trafficking in cocaine, one count of sale of marijuana, one count of trafficking in cocaine in an amount greater than 400 grams, and one count of possession of flunitrazepam with intent to distribute.1 After a hearing, the trial court denied Swantner’s motion to withdraw his plea in a lengthy, well-reasoned, and thorough order. In a single enumeration of error, Swantner argues the court erred in denying his motion because the trial court failed to place on the record an adequate factual basis for the plea and because he was denied effective assistance of counsel in three different respects.2 We disagree and affirm.
1. Swantner contends the trial court did not comply with Uniform Superior Court Rule 33 in recording a factual basis for his plea. The Georgia Supreme Court has held that “the record of the plea hearing must reveal the factual basis relied on so that a reviewing court may determine whether an abuse of discretion occurred. Cit.” Green v. State, 265 Ga. 263, 264 2 454 SE2d 466 1995. But “there is no requirement that the elements of the crime be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Cit. Rather, the court must satisfy itself subjectively that the pleader knows both what he has done and that those acts constitute the crime with which he is charged. Cit.” Battle v. State, 234 Ga. App. 143 1 505 SE2d 573 1998. The factual basis may be demonstrated from the record of the guilty plea hearing itself or other portions of the record such as a bond hearing, Bess v. State, 235 Ga. App. 372, 374 2 508 SE2d 664 1998, or the indictment alone may contain sufficient information to show that the facts alleged by the State satisfy all the elements of the charge to which the defendant pled guilty. Green, supra at 265.