X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The primary question on appeal is whether in a civil forfeiture proceeding a court may consider and grant the State’s oral motion, made and argued at an unreported calendar call, to strike the defendant’s answer for lack of proper verification. Because under OCGA § 9-11-7 b 1 oral motions are only allowed at hearings and trials, which do not include unrecorded calendar calls, we hold the trial court erred in considering the motion and in striking the answer, and therefore vacate the judgment and remand the case.

During a search of Claude Woods’ residence, police found illegal drugs and seized his personal property and currency allegedly found in close proximity to the drugs. The State filed a complaint to have the property and currency forfeited under OCGA § 16-13-49 o. Minutes before the calendar call on the morning trial was scheduled, Woods filed a motion in limine to suppress the evidence and a motion for summary judgment, both on the ground that the search was illegal. At the calendar call which was not recorded, Wood asked for a continuance to have his motions considered, which continuance the court denied. Arguing Woods’ absence from the courtroom meant the answer was not verified as required by law,1 the State orally moved to dismiss Woods’ answer. The court denied Woods’ motions in limine and for summary judgment on the merits and granted the State’s motion to strike, resulting in a judgment of forfeiture. Woods appeals the denial of his summary judgment motion and the striking of his answer.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
May 01, 2025
Atlanta, GA

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More
March 24, 2025
New York, NY

Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.


Learn More

Title: Legal Counsel Reports to: Chief Executive Officer (CEO) FLSA Status: Exempt, Full Time Supervisory Responsibility: N/A Location: Remo...


Apply Now ›

Blume Forte Fried Zerres and Molinari 1 Main Street Chatham, NJ 07945Prominent Morris County Law Firm with a state-wide personal injury prac...


Apply Now ›

d Arcambal Ousley & Cuyler Burk, LLP, a well-established women-owned litigation firm, has an opening in our Parsippany, NJ office. We of...


Apply Now ›