X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Dillard, Chief Judge.   J. F. appeals from the juvenile court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the State’s case against him with prejudice for failure to comply with OCGA § 15-11-521 (b). He argues that because the State failed to file a delinquency petition within 30 days after his release from detention and neglected to seek an extension of time to file same, the juvenile court was required to dismiss the State’s case with prejudice. We originally certified the question presented in this case to the Supreme Court of Georgia, which had granted certiorari in two other cases on this very issue.[1] But while this case was pending, the issue was decided and the question answered by those other cases, and our Supreme Court declined to answer the question certified.[2] This case now returns to this Court and, the answer being controlled by the Supreme Court’s decision in In the Interest of M. D. H.,[3] we affirm the juvenile court’s ruling.   The undisputed facts show that J. F. was detained on January 30, 2015, and charged with robbery by sudden snatching and aggravated assault. The juvenile court released him from custody following a February 2, 2015 detention hearing. But then, on March 16, 2015, J. F. moved to dismiss the case with prejudice due to the State’s failure to file a delinquency petition. On March 17, 2015, acknowledging that no delinquency petition had been filed within 30 days of J. F.’s release from custody as required by OCGA § 15-11-521 (b), the State simultaneously administratively dismissed the complaint and filed a new complaint identical to the one it had just dismissed. Then, the State filed a delinquency petition within 30 days of the new complaint.At a March 25, 2015 hearing on J. F.’s motion to dismiss, the assistant district attorney explained that no delinquency petition had been timely filed within 30 days of J. F.’s release because, in the course of implementing a new organizational system within her office, J. F.’s case had been overlooked. The assistant district attorney further informed the court that (1) her office’s procedure was to administratively dismiss and then re-file complaints when the original time limit was missed , and (2) a motion for an extension of time had not been filed because she thought such a motion “would just be a waste of the court’s time.” Ultimately, the juvenile court denied J. F.’s motion to dismiss with prejudice, and this interlocutory appeal followed.Once again, J. F. argues that the State failed to comply with OCGA § 15-11-521[4] when it did not file a delinquency petition within 30 days after his release from detention and neglected to seek an extension of time to file same and, thus, that the juvenile court was required to dismiss the State’s case with prejudice. But the Supreme Court of Georgia has determined that “if the State fails to file a delinquency petition within the required 30 days or to seek and receive an extension of that deadline, the case must be dismissed without prejudice.”[5] Accordingly, J. F.’s contention is without merit, and we affirm.Judgment affirmed. Barnes, P. J., Miller, P. J., Ellington, P. J., McFadden, P. J., Doyle, P. J., Andrews, Ray, Branch, McMillian, Rickman, Mercier, Reese, Self and Bethel, JJ., concur.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 05, 2024
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
September 06, 2024
Johannesburg

The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.


Learn More
September 12, 2024
New York, NY

Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.


Learn More

RECRUITMENT BONUS Newly hired employees from this recruitment may be eligible to receive bonus payments up to $3,000!* FLEXIBLE SCHEDULE: ...


Apply Now ›

Morristown, NJ; New York, NY Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in multiple offices for a Counsel in our Litigation Department. The ...


Apply Now ›

The Forest Preserves of Cook CountyIs seeking applicants forDeputy Chief Attorney The Forest Preserves of Cook County is seeking a detail-o...


Apply Now ›
06/27/2024
The American Lawyer

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
06/21/2024
Daily Business Review

Full Page Announcement


View Announcement ›