X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Melton, Chief Justice.Following a jury trial, Michael Izells Parks, a previously convicted felon, was found guilty of malice murder, aggravated assault, cruelty to children, and various other offenses in connection with the shooting death of Lewis Anderson and pointing a gun at Tori Anderson while in the presence of a child.[1] On appeal, Parks contends that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his conviction for malice murder and that the trial court erred in sentencing him to imprisonment for life without the possibility of parole. We affirm.1. Viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, the evidence presented at trial revealed that, on January 28, 2015, Parks was living with his girlfriend, Maqueda Weatherby, in a government-subsidized apartment in Fulton County. Although Weatherby and her eight-year-old daughter were the only persons legally authorized to live in the apartment, brothers Lewis and Tori Anderson, Tori’s girlfriend Vonteria Bradley, and Tori and Bradley’s three minor children also resided in the apartment. When a government inspection of the apartment on January 28, 2015 revealed the unclean nature of Tori and Lewis’s rooms, Weatherby became fearful that she would lose the apartment, and she told Bradley that Bradley, Bradley’s children, Tori, and Lewis would have to move out. Bradley then contacted the police about a “roommate dispute” with Weatherby, and, when police arrived at the apartment, Weatherby told them that she wanted Bradley and Bradley’s children removed from her home. However, police informed Weatherby that she would have to “legally evict” the family and give them time to move. Around that same time, Weatherby called her adult son, Brandon Dorsey, and told him to come to the apartment to pick up her daughter because “it was about to go down” at the residence.Soon after the police left, Lewis and Tori arrived at the apartment and began packing their belongings to prepare to move out. When Lewis went downstairs to the kitchen, Dorsey had arrived and he was in the kitchen as well, and Lewis and Dorsey got into an argument. Lewis then went back upstairs and yelled “F**k Brandon [Dorsey]! F**k Maqueda [Weatherby]! F**k Mike [Parks],” to which Parks responded by yelling, “F**k you, too!” Lewis went to the upstairs room of Weatherby’s eight-year-old daughter and yelled at her to get her brother, Dorsey, under control “before I beat his a**.” Parks then went upstairs while holding a .357 magnum in his hand, said “What you say, n*****?” to Lewis, and, without Lewis attacking Parks in any way, shot the unarmed Lewis in the chest, killing him. Parks then pointed the gun at Tori and told him to “get back.” Bradley pushed Tori and her children into a bedroom and begged Parks not to shoot them. Parks walked away, and Bradley called the police.Parks eluded police for nearly six weeks until he was found in a hotel room with Weatherby and arrested.The evidence was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to reject Parks’s claim that he had been acting in self-defense at the time that he shot Lewis and find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of malice murder and the other crimes of which he was convicted. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SCt 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). See also, e.g., Roper v. State, 281 Ga. 878 (1) (644 SE2d 120) (2007) (witness credibility is for jury to decide, as is the question of justification; therefore, jury is free to reject claim that defendant acted in self-defense).2. Parks contends that, because the death penalty can be imposed in cases involving the crime of malice murder, the trial court erred in sentencing him to life without the possibility of parole without first considering any mitigating or aggravating circumstances that would be taken into account in a death penalty case. See OCGA § 17-10-30 (“In all cases . . . for which the death penalty may be authorized, the judge shall consider . . . any mitigating circumstances or aggravating circumstances otherwise authorized by law.”) (emphasis supplied). However, as this Court made clear in Williams v. State, 291 Ga. 19, 20 (1) (727 SE2d 95) (2012):Prior to April 29, 2009, a person who was convicted of murder could either be sentenced to death or life in prison with the possibility of parole. Life sentences without the possibility of parole were only imposed in those cases in which the State sought the death penalty. In 2009, the General Assembly passed Ga. L. 2009, p. 223, § 1 . . . which amended OCGA § 16-5-1 (d) to add the sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole as one of the punishments for murder. The bill also repealed OCGA §§ 17-10-31.1 and 17-10-32.1, thereby removing requirements that a jury find an aggravating circumstance before imposing the sentence of life without parole (OCGA § 17-10-31.1) and removing the sentencing duties of a judge regarding a person who pled guilty to an offense for which the death penalty or life without parole could be imposed (OCGA § 17-10-32.1).(citations and punctuation omitted). See also Kimbrough v. State, 300 Ga. 516, 518 n.5 (796 SE2d 694) (2017) (“In 2009, the General Assembly amended the murder statute, OCGA § 16-5-1, to authorize a sentence of life without parole for all murders committed on or after April 29, 2009.”). The State did not seek the death penalty in this case, and the murder here took place after April 29, 2009. The trial court was authorized to sentence Parks to life without the possibility of parole for malice murder and was not required to recite that it considered aggravated or mitigating circumstances in doing so.Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
May 01, 2025
Atlanta, GA

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
December 02, 2024 - December 03, 2024
Scottsdale, AZ

Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!


Learn More
December 11, 2024
Las Vegas, NV

This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.


Learn More

Our client, a boutique litigation firm established by former BigLaw partners, is seeking to hire a junior-mid level associate their rapidly ...


Apply Now ›

Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking an associate to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates must have four to eight years...


Apply Now ›

SENIOR ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY, BOUTIQUE LAW FIRM, CORPORATE LAW We provide strategic advisory and legal services to the world's leading archite...


Apply Now ›