X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Doyle, Presiding Judge. Following her divorce from Jack B. Mounts, Jr., Carole Ann Andriola filed a contempt petition. The trial court issued a final order awarding Mounts attorney fees in the amount of $1,500. Andriola appeals, arguing that the trial court erred by failing to specify the basis for the award.[1] For the reasons that follow, we vacate the attorney fee award and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The record shows that the parties were divorced in 2009. In 2017, Andriola filed a contempt petition, alleging that Mounts had failed to cooperate in submitting an insurance claim for damage to the marital home. Mounts answered and requested that he “be awarded [a]ttorney[] fees.” At the hearing, Andriola testified that she received an insurance check for damage to her home a few weeks after she filed the contempt petition. Mounts requested attorney fees in the amount of $1,500 — the fee charged by his attorney to defend the contempt action — pursuant to OCGA § 9-15-14. In response, Andriola’s attorney argued that the issues raised in the contempt petition were moot and no longer “being pursued,” and Mounts had failed to provide notice of his intent to seek attorney fees under OCGA § 9-15-14. After the hearing, the trial court entered a final order, stating in relevant part: “[I]t is hereby the [o]rder of the court that there are no issues of any alleged contempt and [Andriola] is not awarded any attorney fees or costs. [Mounts] is awarded the sum of $1,500[] as attorney fees payable to [Mounts] by [Andriola] within 90 days of the date of this order.” On appeal, Andriola argues that the trial court erred by awarding attorney fees without specifying the statutory basis for the award or making factual findings to support it. We agree. [I]f a trial court fails to make findings of fact sufficient to support an award of attorney fees under either OCGA § 1962 or § 91514, the case must be remanded to the trial court for an explanation of the statutory basis for the award and any findings necessary to support it. We therefore vacate the trial court’s award of attorney fees and remand for the court to explain the statutory basis of any attorney fees award and to make the necessary findings in support of such an award.[2] Judgment vacated and case remanded with direction. McFadden, C. J., and Hodges, J., concur.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
May 01, 2025
Atlanta, GA

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
December 02, 2024 - December 03, 2024
Scottsdale, AZ

Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!


Learn More
December 11, 2024
Las Vegas, NV

This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.


Learn More

Experienced Insurance Defense Attorney.No in office requirement.Send resume to:


Apply Now ›

We are seeking two attorneys with a minimum of two to three years of experience to join our prominent and thriving education law practice in...


Apply Now ›

Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the New York office for a Real Estate Litigation Associate with three to six years of commerci...


Apply Now ›