Warren, Justice. Appellant Bobby Jay Cole appeals from the trial court’s summary denial of his motion for out-of-time appeal from his murder and armed robbery convictions. Because the trial court did not hold a hearing to determine whether Cole was deprived of his right to appeal due to the constitutionally ineffective assistance of his plea counsel, we vacate the court’s order and remand for such a hearing. On September 10, 1990, Cole was indicted by a Catoosa County grand jury for malice murder and armed robbery. Those crimes occurred on August 13, 1990, when Cole was 16 years old. On April 1, 1991, Cole pleaded guilty to those crimes and received concurrent life sentences. On March 13, 2020, Cole file a pro se motion for out- of-time appeal in the trial court, contending that under Collier v. State, 307 Ga. 363 (834 SE2d 769) (2019), he was entitled to an out- of-time appeal because his plea counsel’s ineffective assistance deprived him of his right to an appeal.[1] On May 8, 2020, without holding an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied Cole’s motion. Cole, who is proceeding pro se, timely filed this appeal. “‘A criminal defendant is entitled to an out-of-time appeal if his counsel’s constitutionally deficient performance deprived him of an appeal of right that he otherwise would have pursued.’” Clark v. State, __ Ga. __, __ (__ SE2d __) (Case No. S20A1151, decided December 7, 2020) (quoting Collier v. State, 307 Ga. 363, 364 (834 SE2d 769) (2019)). For that reason, in a number of recent cases, we have held that “‘when a defendant alleges in a motion for an out-of-time appeal that he was deprived of his right to appeal due to his counsel’s ineffective assistance, the trial court must hold an evidentiary hearing to determine whether counsel was in fact responsible for the failure to pursue a timely appeal.’” Clark, ___ Ga. at __ (quoting Rutledge v. State, __ Ga. __, __ (847 SE2d 143, 144) (2020)). Accord Burley v. State, 308 Ga. 650, 651-652 (842 SE2d 851) (2020); Collier, 307 Ga. at 376. “[A] trial court ‘abuses its discretion when it fails to make such a factual inquiry.’” Clark, __- Ga. at ___ (quoting Burley, 308 Ga. at 651). Here, Cole alleged in his motion for out-of-time appeal that plea counsel’s ineffective assistance deprived him of his right to an appeal. The trial court therefore was required to hold an evidentiary hearing to inquire into the factual basis for Cole’s claim. See Clark, __ Ga. at __ . Because the trial court denied Cole’s motion without holding such a hearing, we must “vacate the trial court’s judgment and remand ‘for the court to conduct an evidentiary hearing and determine whether plea counsel’s ineffective assistance was responsible for [Cole's] failure to pursue a timely appeal.’” Id. at ___ (quoting Rutledge, 847 SE2d at 145).[2] Judgment vacated and case remanded with direction. Melton, C.J., Nahmias, P. J., and Boggs, Peterson, Bethel, Ellington, and McMillian, JJ., concur.
