Chaney v. The State

Demand For New Trial Based on Trial Counsel's Ineffective Assistance Should Have Been Raised by Petition for Habeas Relief

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Bethel, Justice. Sixteen years after his conviction for felony murder and other crimes,^{^[1]} Appellant James Chaney filed an extraordinary motion for new trial in the trial court, raising claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The trial court dismissed the motion, and Chaney now appeals. For reasons different than those relied upon by the trial court, we affirm. It appears that the trial court construed Chaney’s motion as one seeking an out-of-time appeal, and in dismissing the motion, the trial court relied on this Court’s decision in Cook v. State, 313 Ga. 471, 506 (5) (870 SE2d 758) (2022), which held that the out-of-time appeal procedure “is not a legally cognizable vehicle for a convicted defendant to seek relief for alleged constitutional violations.” But an extraordinary motion for new trial is distinct from an out-of-time appeal, and, therefore, the trial court’s reliance on Cook was misplaced. See Bohannon v. State, 262 Ga. 697, 698 (425 SE2d 653) (1993). Nevertheless, Chaney’s motion was properly dismissed. Chaney’s extraordinary motion for new trial raised only claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. An extraordinary motion for new trial, however, is an improper vehicle for such claims because an adequate alternative remedy exists in the form of habeas corpus. Mitchum v. State, 306 Ga. 878, 887 (2) (834 SE2d 65) (2019) (“Because habeas corpus provided an adequate remedy, an extraordinary motion for new trial was not the appropriate vehicle for [appellant] to pursue his claims, [including claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel,] and the trial court should have dismissed the motion.”). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s dismissal of Chaney’s extraordinary motion for new trial. Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

Chaney v. The State

Demand For New Trial Based on Trial Counsel's Ineffective Assistance Should Have Been Raised by Petition for Habeas Relief

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to Daily Report