The State v. Middleton

On remand and direction from the Georgia Supreme Court, the court vacated its prior judgment and remanded for clarification of an officer's jurisdiction in traffic stop evidence suppression case

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Dillard, Presiding Judge. In State v. Middleton,^{^[1]} the State appealed the trial court’s grant of Patrick Middleton’s motion to suppress evidence obtained during a traffic stop. In doing so, the State argued the court erred in ruling that because Officer Amanda Graw of the Kingsland Police Department—a municipal law enforcement officer—initiated the traffic stop of Middleton’s vehicle outside the municipality’s boundaries, she had no jurisdiction and thus was not engaged in the lawful discharge of her official duties at the time of the search and subsequent arrest. We agreed with the State, and reversed the grant of Middleton’s motion to suppress, concluding that Officer Graw had jurisdiction because she had been adequately deputized by the Camden County Sheriff’s Office several years prior to the subject traffic stop. We further determined the trial court’s finding that the State failed to introduce evidence as to the scope or content of this deputization was belied by Officer Graw’s uncontradicted testimony that she was, in fact, authorized to make arrests in Camden County. Then, in Middleton v. State,^{^[2]} the Supreme Court of Georgia vacated our opinion, explaining that the trial court’s order was unclear as to whether it made a factual finding regarding the scope of Officer Graw’s deputization (which would be entitled to deference) or a legal ruling on the effect and duration of a general deputization (which would be subject to de novo review).^{^[3]} As a result, our Supreme Court directed us to vacate the trial court’s order and remand the case with direction, seeking clarification as to whether the court’s ruling that Officer Graw did not have legal authority to stop and search Middleton was based on the factual finding that she had been deputized for particular cases only. Accordingly, we vacate our prior opinion, adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own, vacate the trial court’s order, and remand this case for the court to clarify its order as directed. Judgment vacated and remanded. Mercier, C. J., and Markle, J., concur.

The State v. Middleton

On remand and direction from the Georgia Supreme Court, the court vacated its prior judgment and remanded for clarification of an officer's jurisdiction in traffic stop evidence suppression case

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to Daily Report